• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best subcontinental batsman: 2000-2010

Who is the best subcontinental test batsman (2000-2010)

  • Total voters
    46
vcs

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Migara said:
In ODIs Aravinda > Sanga. There is a gulf between the current lot and Aravinda, Arjuna and Sanath.

In test matches Sanga > Aravinda. But if Aravinda was coached formally, would have averaged 50+ in current era. Sanga is a carefully cultivated talent. Aravinda was picked out of weeds.
Click to expand...
AWTA. Not aware about the coaching part, but yeah, such as it stands, those assessments are fair enough.

Sanga and Mahela really don't do justice to their ability in ODIs.
 
Blaze 18

Blaze 18

Banned
I am not trying to denigrate Kumar Sangakkara's achievements as a batsman. He is a fine player, obviously. I rate players a little differently from others, however. If we all had the same views, this forum would cease to exist :)
 
Shri

Shri

Mr. Glass
Blaze 18 said:
I am not trying to denigrate Kumar Sangakkara's achievements as a batsman. He is a fine player, obviously. I rate players a little differently from others, however. If we all had the same views, this forum would cease to exist :)
Click to expand...
Awta.:ph34r:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top