• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

bond=>mcgrath>akram

miscer

U19 Cricketer
Okay. So here are the stats. Clearly Bond didnt play enough tests but in pure skill he is better than both of the others. And in ODI's he leaves them in the dust



even garner isnt as good. Garner is pretty close though not gonna lie.
 
Last edited:

Blaze 18

Banned
Okay. So here are the stats. Clearly Bond didnt play enough tests but in pure skill he is better than both of the others. And in ODI's he leaves them in the dust
As good as Shane Bond was, Wasim Akram was far more skilled than him. Of course, there is no shame in being second best to Wasim Akram. Only a handful of great fast bowlers over the history of the game compare. In fact, if you are talking pure skill, I do not think even Glenn McGrath beats him.
 

miscer

U19 Cricketer
As good as Shane Bond was, Wasim Akram was far more skilled than him. Of course, there is no shame in being second best to Wasim Akram. Only a handful of great fast bowlers over the history of the game compare. In fact, if you are talking pure skill, I do not think even Glenn McGrath beats him.
LOL. Yea Akram is worse than McGrath in every single statistic in both forms of the game (except wickets in ODI and 5 wicket hauls in tests ) but he is more skilled.

How do you define skill?
 

Blaze 18

Banned
LOL. Yea Akram is worse than McGrath in every single statistic in both forms of the game (except wickets in ODI and 5 wicket hauls in tests ) but he is more skilled.

How do you define skill?
Statistics and skill do not neccessarily go hand in hand.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
All the stats show are that it was a terrible shame that Bond had such a wretched run with injuries.Could have gone down as ATG but wasn't on the park often enough sadly.
 

Debris

International 12th Man
Durability does count, though, in weighing up bowlers. It is a lot easier to put in a peak performance if you only play one series in 5 and, really, how valuable is a bowler who is almost never available.
 

kingkallis

International Coach
Okay. So here are the stats. Clearly Bond didnt play enough tests but in pure skill he is better than both of the others. And in ODI's he leaves them in the dust



even garner isnt as good. Garner is pretty close though not gonna lie.
Awesome :notworthy
 

kingkallis

International Coach
Durability does count, though, in weighing up bowlers. It is a lot easier to put in a peak performance if you only play one series in 5 and, really, how valuable is a bowler who is almost never available.
Whenever we talk about durability - Makhaya Ntini comes to my mind without any doubt! I just dont understand how he kept himself fit for this long.
 

Top