I think this is the first Ashes related poll so far. here goes. Who do you thing will take more wickets over the Ashes 2010-1011 tour.
That's what she said.
They're both losers, but in Australian conditions I'd back Hauritz.
Agree with Athlai. Panasar would be rather unlikely to get a game.
"I will go down as Darren Sammy, the one who always smiles" - Darren Sammy
Both to play at Sydney perhaps, or is it no longer such a Bunsen?
Hauritz will presumably take more wickets, doesn't make him the better bowler though. Monty took 100 Test wickets in pretty good time.
The point of playing Panesar on a Bunsen along with Swann despite the fact that hes proven categorically to be rubbish on them belies logic if you ask me.
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
Could see both of them struggling to get a gig, actually. Judging by the sparing way he used him in the first test and the uber-defensive fields he set for him in the second (or allowed Hauritz to set for himself, if one's inclined to believe him and I'm frankly not) I don't much think Ponting fancies Doogie's bowling just now.
- As featured in The Independent.
"Even when England lost 5-0 in 2006-07 I don't remember them folding like this. This is as bad as I have seen from an England side."
- Mick Vaughan on the 2013/14 tourists' efforts
If sense prevails none of them should feature in the Ashes.
Be VERY AFRIDI!!
I voted for Panesar without reading the first post. Hauritz will take more wickets because he'll be playing a lot more games.
Panesar is a sick noob, whereas Hauritz is a decent spinner and will play more games.
Proudly supporting Central Districts
The Culture of Mediocrity is forever, and is proudly brought to you by New Zealand Cricket in association with Grant Bradburn Sports and the Unholy Alliance
RIP Craig Walsh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)