I think this is the first Ashes related poll so far. here goes. Who do you thing will take more wickets over the Ashes 2010-1011 tour.
That's what she said.
They're both losers, but in Australian conditions I'd back Hauritz.
Agree with Athlai. Panasar would be rather unlikely to get a game.
"I will go down as Darren Sammy, the one who always smiles" - Darren Sammy
Both to play at Sydney perhaps, or is it no longer such a Bunsen?
Hauritz will presumably take more wickets, doesn't make him the better bowler though. Monty took 100 Test wickets in pretty good time.
The point of playing Panesar on a Bunsen along with Swann despite the fact that hes proven categorically to be rubbish on them belies logic if you ask me.
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
Could see both of them struggling to get a gig, actually. Judging by the sparing way he used him in the first test and the uber-defensive fields he set for him in the second (or allowed Hauritz to set for himself, if one's inclined to believe him and I'm frankly not) I don't much think Ponting fancies Doogie's bowling just now.
Cricket Web's current Premier League Tipping Champion
- As featured in The Independent.
"I don't think that they'll come close to us to be honest."
- Steve Smith before the Ashes
If sense prevails none of them should feature in the Ashes.
Be VERY AFRIDI!!
I voted for Panesar without reading the first post. Hauritz will take more wickets because he'll be playing a lot more games.
[repeat post of previous stated position]
Panesar is a sick noob, whereas Hauritz is a decent spinner and will play more games.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)