I think this is the first Ashes related poll so far. here goes. Who do you thing will take more wickets over the Ashes 2010-1011 tour.
That's what she said.
They're both losers, but in Australian conditions I'd back Hauritz.
Agree with Athlai. Panasar would be rather unlikely to get a game.
"I will go down as Darren Sammy, the one who always smiles" - Darren Sammy
Both to play at Sydney perhaps, or is it no longer such a Bunsen?
Hauritz will presumably take more wickets, doesn't make him the better bowler though. Monty took 100 Test wickets in pretty good time.
The point of playing Panesar on a Bunsen along with Swann despite the fact that hes proven categorically to be rubbish on them belies logic if you ask me.
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
Could see both of them struggling to get a gig, actually. Judging by the sparing way he used him in the first test and the uber-defensive fields he set for him in the second (or allowed Hauritz to set for himself, if one's inclined to believe him and I'm frankly not) I don't much think Ponting fancies Doogie's bowling just now.
- As featured in The Independent.
"Predictably, the ending of his international career did not end the argument about Pietersen's merits, as an army of informed commentators and Piers Morgan weighed in to defend or attack him."
- The Guardian's Andrew Anthony
If sense prevails none of them should feature in the Ashes.
Be VERY AFRIDI!!
I voted for Panesar without reading the first post. Hauritz will take more wickets because he'll be playing a lot more games.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)