Monty Panesar v. Nathan Hauritz

[andruid]

I think this is the first Ashes related poll so far. here goes. Who do you thing will take more wickets over the Ashes 2010-1011 tour.

 

[Athlai]

Panesar won't play unless Swann loses an arm.

 

[andruid]

Panesar won't play unless Swann loses an arm.

That was unnaturally fast

 

[Athlai]

That's what she said.

 

[Bloody Hell]

They're both losers, but in Australian conditions I'd back Hauritz.

 

[Himannv]

Agree with Athlai. Panasar would be rather unlikely to get a game.

 

[Bloody Hell]

Panesar won't play unless Swann loses an arm.

Even then it depends on which arm.

 

[stumpski]

Both to play at Sydney perhaps, or is it no longer such a Bunsen?

Hauritz will presumably take more wickets, doesn't make him the better bowler though. Monty took 100 Test wickets in pretty good time.

 

[tooextracool]

The point of playing Panesar on a Bunsen along with Swann despite the fact that hes proven categorically to be rubbish on them belies logic if you ask me.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Could see both of them struggling to get a gig, actually. Judging by the sparing way he used him in the first test and the uber-defensive fields he set for him in the second (or allowed Hauritz to set for himself, if one's inclined to believe him and I'm frankly not) I don't much think Ponting fancies Doogie's bowling just now.

 

[aussie]

If sense prevails none of them should feature in the Ashes.

 

[Faisal1985]

Monty imo.

 

[Prince EWS]

I voted for Panesar without reading the first post. Hauritz will take more wickets because he'll be playing a lot more games.

 

[Top_Cat]

[repeat post of previous stated position]

 

[Flem274*]

Panesar is a sick noob, whereas Hauritz is a decent spinner and will play more games.

 

[Burgey]

Hauritz easily. Will **** all over Roger Ramjet too.

 

[irottev]

Panesar. I hate to say it. Hauritz is AWFUL

 

[DingDong]

patel is better than both

 

[aussie]

patel is better than both

I'd say all three are equally crap. None of them have the ability to do the main job of a test spinner and be a consistent wicket-taking threat againts good batting sides on a turner/wearing 5th day wicket.

 

[Jacknife]

If they played the same amount of games I'd say Panesar, but from a England point of view, I hope I don't see Monty, apart from bringing out the drinks.