cricket betting betway blog banner small

View Poll Results: Whoi will be the better Ashes spinner

28. You may not vote on this poll
  • Monty Panesar

    8 28.57%
  • Nathan Hauritz

    17 60.71%
  • Micheal Clarke to pwn both

    3 10.71%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Monty Panesar v. Nathan Hauritz

  1. #16
    Cricket Web Staff Member Burgey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    The Castle
    Hauritz easily. Will **** all over Roger Ramjet too.
    WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie

    "Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn

    #408. Sixty three not out forever.

  2. #17
    U19 Cricketer irottev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    New Zealand
    Panesar. I hate to say it. Hauritz is AWFUL

  3. #18
    State Captain
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    patel is better than both

  4. #19
    Hall of Fame Member aussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Fine Leg/Technical Area
    Quote Originally Posted by DingDong View Post
    patel is better than both
    I'd say all three are equally crap. None of them have the ability to do the main job of a test spinner and be a consistent wicket-taking threat againts good batting sides on a turner/wearing 5th day wicket.

  5. #20
    International Captain Jacknife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    West Yorkshire.
    If they played the same amount of games I'd say Panesar, but from a England point of view, I hope I don't see Monty, apart from bringing out the drinks.

  6. #21
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend _Ed_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Marsden Bay, NZ
    Quote Originally Posted by Athlai View Post
    That's what she said.

    Anyway, Hauritz IMO.

  7. #22
    School Boy/Girl Captain robinjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010

  8. #23
    International Captain andruid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Old Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacknife View Post
    If they played the same amount of games I'd say Panesar, but from a England point of view, I hope I don't see Monty, apart from bringing out the drinks.
    I have this strange theory that Monty will rout a local Aussie XI in a tour match and buy an additional 2 or 3 tests (aside form the Sydney test where he is the automatic 2nd spinner) on the back of that,whilst Hauritz will be limited to 2-3 wickets a test on the back of being the 'obvious' threat. Hence when all is said and done, Panesar might edge the wicket tally by 1 or 2.

    Its an absurd theory dependant on 2 big ifs I know, but I cannot completely remove it from my mind

    To complete the absurdity of my vote is that I suspect Michael Clarke can bowl better than people think, and he could mop up a few tails here and there, getting his overall Ashes wicket tally past Hauritz. Its highly unlikely I know, but not totally impossible
    Quote Originally Posted by andruid View Post
    I have heard it said that Chuck Norris' googly would literally break legs.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hauritz and Strauss catches, Lord's Test
    By Richard in forum Ashes 2009
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 26-07-2009, 06:19 AM
  2. Nathan Hauritz
    By Smith in forum Ashes 2009
    Replies: 212
    Last Post: 23-07-2009, 06:28 AM
  3. A Different View on Monty Panesar
    By Penguinissimo in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 23-12-2008, 05:33 AM
  4. Mahmood and Panesar power England to series glory
    By symonds_94 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-08-2006, 10:11 AM
  5. Nathan Hauritz picks up a NSW contract.
    By Haddin in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-06-2006, 04:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts