Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27-08-2010, 11:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Black_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TEF
Posts: 2,447
Who would be your number 3 in your test team?

You are the captain of a test team. You have to pick a batsman at number 3.
Your options are
1) Ricky Ponting
2) Rahul Dravid
3) Jacques Kallis


Now this is not necessarily NOW hence Ponting's and Dravid's current poor form does not count.

Say this is an imaginary period where Ponting is at his peak scoring century almost every match, Dravid just got his 230 in Adelaide, and Jacques Kallis is averaging 55 with the bat.




1) You are the captain of the team, hence whether Ponting is a good or a bad captain is irrelevant.

2) This is NOT Ponting vs Kallis vs Dravid overall. I think it is pretty clear Ricky Ponting is the better batsman..he is compared with Tendulkar and Lara after all.
This is an imaginary time period where Dravid, Kallis and Ponting are at their peaks at the very same time.

3) No you do not get Tendulkar and Lara and Sehwag, This is not your All Time XI

4) This is a 6th or 7th ranked test team, so the players are of that quality.

5) We will assume Jacques Kallis does not bowl.



These three players are as very different from each other and yet they made the number 3 position their very own in their respective teams. Ricky Ponting is the attacking one, with all the shots in the book, Rahul Dravid at his peak was the wall, almost impossible to get him out while Jacques Kallis has been the most solid, dependable and successful batsman of his team.

Basically I am interested in how players of different styles and nature appeal to different people.

Who would you pick?

Last edited by Black_Warrior; 28-08-2010 at 05:02 AM.
Black_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2010, 11:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
vcs
International Coach
 
vcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
Ponting.
vcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2010, 11:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Noble One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,112
So essentially this is the same thing as Ponting v Kallis v Dravid at each individual cricketers peak?

All three very much equals with the bat and you lose very little by selecting one over the other. I would select Kallis simply for the extra value he brings to the team.
Noble One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2010, 11:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,527
Right, if it is overall, and not now, than Ponting.
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 12:25 AM   #5 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Athlai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wellywood, NZ
Posts: 26,001
Almost impossible to say without knowledge of team balance since they all offer their own unique little something extra. Kallis bowling, Dravid defence, Ponting captaincy, fielding and attack.

Ponting is probably the best batsman so I'll go him without anything else.
__________________
Direbirds FTW!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Athlai View Post
Wellington will win the whole thing next year. Mark my words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem274* View Post
I'll offer up my avatar to Athlai forever if Wellington wins the Champions League.
President of T.I.T.S
Tamim Is Talented Society
Athlai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 01:17 AM   #6 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
honestbharani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 15,213
As others have said, depends on what the rest of the team is like. IF I get Lara and Sachin at 4 and 5 with say a Sehwag also there at the top, then I would take Kallis, coz he fits in there.. Else, always go for the best batsmen, which I feel is Ponting, among these 3.
__________________
We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
In the end, I think it's so utterly, incomprehensibly boring. There is so much context behind each innings of cricket that dissecting statistics into these small samples is just worthless. No-one has ever been faced with the same situation in which they come out to bat as someone else. Ever.
A cricket supporter forever

Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.


Check out this awesome e-fed:

PWE Efed
honestbharani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 01:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Spark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: A Blood Rainbow
Posts: 26,759
If we're talking at their peaks then I would take Ponting over almost every other single batsman you could ever name.
__________________
+ and the buzz surrounds it does +


* * *

in which cribb demonstrates the power of the jinx


Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spark View Post
[Dhoni on 99] Barely seen any of the day's play (for sanity's sake), but here's a competition that might be fun: things more common than a Tim Bresnan wicket
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
3) Dhoni scoring a composed, valuable Test hundred against good bowlers
Quote:
129.1 Anderson to Dhoni, OUT, Dhoni is run out on 99!
Spark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 02:02 AM   #8 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
wpdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,920
Good luck persuading Kallis to bat at number 3.
wpdavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 02:04 AM   #9 (permalink)
Eternal Optimist
 
GIMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shake my tree where's the apple for me?
Posts: 43,622
Stuart Broad
__________________
Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they’ll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces

RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
GIMH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 02:33 AM   #10 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Shri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,937
Poontang. Only attacking option among the three and he was better at his peak anyway even if we don't take that aggressive factor into discussion.
__________________
RIP Craigos. Owe you a beer.:(

http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/2186298-post7381.html

4-0; 5-0; 4-0; 3-0; 4-0

Banter is a two way street. Deal with it.
Shri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 02:34 AM   #11 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
flibbertyjibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: England
Posts: 7,941
Trott.

Has to be Ponting though over their careers.Been a class act and a threat to all.
flibbertyjibber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 02:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
vcs
International Coach
 
vcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeraintIsMyHero View Post
Stuart Broad


vcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 05:01 AM   #13 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Black_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TEF
Posts: 2,447
Ok sorry,

here is more information


1) You are the captain of the team, hence whether Ponting is a good or a bad captain is irrelevant.

2) This is NOT Ponting vs Kallis vs Dravid overall. I think it is pretty clear Ricky Ponting is the better batsman..he is compared with Tendulkar and Lara after all.
This is an imaginary time period where Dravid, Kallis and Ponting are at their peaks at the very same time.

3) No you do not get Tendulkar and Lara and Sehwag, This is not your All Time XI

4) This is a 6th or 7th ranked test team, so the players are of that quality.

5) We will assume Jacques Kallis does not bowl.



These three players are as very different from each other and yet they made the number 3 position their very own in their respective teams. Ricky Ponting is the attacking one, with all the shots in the book, Rahul Dravid at his peak was the wall, almost impossible to get him out while Jacques Kallis has been the most solid, dependable and successful batsman of his team.

Basically I am interested in how players of different styles and nature appeal to different people.

Last edited by Black_Warrior; 28-08-2010 at 05:02 AM.
Black_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 05:11 AM   #14 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Teja.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: z
Posts: 5,881
Ponting.
Teja. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-08-2010, 05:11 AM   #15 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Migara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colombo, SL
Posts: 5,175
Sangakkara
__________________
Diuretics are used to look good at TV shows

I played for 20 years in the Lankan team, I did not have any problems as a Tamil - Muralidaran
Migara is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cricket Web Cycling Team Samuel_Vimes General Sports Forum 565 26-12-2008 05:52 PM
lara vs tendulkar thehellraiser Cricket Chat 269 30-11-2007 08:54 AM
It takes time to change : An insight into Bangladesh Cricket Miraz Cricket Chat 7 22-11-2007 05:51 AM
Oldest Test Team? chaminda_00 Cricket Chat 18 13-09-2006 10:01 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web