Hrithik
Banned
Hrithik, you've been warned before about making the same post multiple times. Once is enough.
sorry i will use multi quote next time i need a bit time to learn plzz dont ban me from anything plzzz
Hrithik, you've been warned before about making the same post multiple times. Once is enough.
But it will help to foster the art of spin bowling & eliminate the boring mid overs of odisDisagree that 'spinplay' would make cricket more strategic. It would make the cricket more formulaic - why take away a captain's ability to strategically manage who bowls and when? If over-rates are the sole concern, then carry over the mandated over-rate from T20 (can't imagine you'd really want to go much faster than that).
50 over cricket will die and it will take cricket with itsounds like a format that would suit many of the sub continental countries. Want a way to spice up 50 over cricket? Maybe don't make the pitches so flat every ****ing game
it will add a bit color to the boring game esp mid oversAnother rule you suggest, the return of the super-sub. I imagine many would be against.
The reason it is no longer used is because it was a really poor rule. Another rule that just confuses fans, is only beneficial in certain specific circumstances, placed far too much reliance on whoever won the toss and has thankfully been abolished.
Would actually make a decent thread topic itself. Interesting to hear after four years if many would like the return of the super-sub, what could be done to improve the rule.
To be honest, I think it would be good, as it would renew the importance of spin, which has faced an up hill marathon since the introduction of the IPL and other Twenty20 competitions.Compulsory spin is a terrible idea.
Swann, Mishra, Smith and others all excelled at the T20 World Cup. The art of spin is not dying at all. It is just that because we have lost/are about to lose arguably the two greatest spin bowlers of all time, who by coincidence happened to have their career's coincide, people have their expectations out of proportion with reality.To be honest, I think it would be good, as it would renew the importance of spin, which has faced an up hill marathon since the introduction of the IPL and other Twenty20 competitions.
Sorry, what?To be honest, I think it would be good, as it would renew the importance of spin, which has faced an up hill marathon since the introduction of the IPL and other Twenty20 competitions.
I second this.This all sounds to me like a bunch of arse.
The boring middle overs of an ODI? You mean the ones which are mostly bowled now by spinners and such...it will help fasten the game & spice up the boring middle overs of an ODI & will give some respect to the artistry of spin bowling
yup middle overs become confusing and boring to the viewers when bowling changes are introducedThe boring middle overs of an ODI? You mean the ones which are mostly bowled now by spinners and such...
Nice effort this, but you can't mandate a type of bowling. Unless you're happy to have it so teams are not allowed to have a spinner bowl with the new ball in this format. Perhaps though, that might not give certain teams enough of an advantage
RT but the no. of fast bowler are always more than spin bowlers spinplay will give them some respect maxm we can reduce it to 10 overs not 14Swann, Mishra, Smith and others all excelled at the T20 World Cup. The art of spin is not dying at all. It is just that because we have lost/are about to lose arguably the two greatest spin bowlers of all time, who by coincidence happened to have their career's coincide, people have their expectations out of proportion with reality.
This is one of the stupidest things I've ever read.yup middle overs become confusing and boring to the viewers when bowling changes are introduced
yeah he was very accomodating. can't believe he got banned for inventing a new exiting format of the game.Also he was trying to be accommodating to feedback you can see that he reduced the number of spin overs down to 10 from 14 based on feedback.