• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Mohammad Ashraful

Polo23

International Debutant
How can someone with such a poor record continually be selected? Even by Bangladesh standards he has a poor international record.

I can understand why they persisted with his poor performances for a while, especially when occasionally he'd come up with an absolute blinder (i'm thinking the ton against Australia in an ODI which won them the game) but these types of knocks are all too infrequent, and they'd benefit more by having someone slightly more consistent. Obviously he is very talented, but talent alone doesn't make a good cricket, especially at international level.

I don't know a great deal about the Bangladeshi FC system but I'd be very surprised if there wasn't SOMEONE who could average more than 23 in test cricket and 24 in ODI's.

This is Ashraful's 10th year in international cricket. He has had 3 acceptable years as a batsman in 2004 where he averaged 40.00 in 8 matches, 2006 where he averaged 30.25 in 4 matches (only just acceptable), and 2007 where he averaged 36.25 in 5 matches. In his last 3 years of international cricket he has had averages of 16.00, 12.66 and 16.50.

Time to bring in someone different and give Ashraful some time to think about his game.
 

Noble One

International Vice-Captain
Ashraful is a very poor batsman, disgrace that a player with such a flimsy technique and termperment can have such a long lasting Test career.

Problem for Bangladesh is the lack of any suitable replacements. Selecting Ashraful who fails time and time again is no different to selecting any other batsman who will have similar failures. The difference with Ashraful is that he does come good one innings every thirty
 

Jayzamann

International Regular
He was also acting as captain for a period of his career, that adds to the incumbency. But it is hard to argue that he has been an inconsistent international batsmen.
 

SaeedAnwar

U19 Debutant
he is weird batsmen, i mean he has 5 amazing centuries, I still remember the amazing 158* he scored back in 2004. sometimes he looks like he is total control, looks similar to Lara or Shewag, but most times he plays terrible shots. Not sure why that is, he has talent but he is not using it properly.
 

Polo23

International Debutant
I have no doubt the talent is there. But his shot selection is dire, it almost looks like he tries to get out some of the time. Obviously if he hasn't realised some of that potential by now (which he clearly hasn't since in the last 3 years his performances have got worse) he likely never will.

I'm sure Bangladesh have some batsmen with similar talent who haven't been given a shot yet. I don't see the harm in dropping Ashraful to give someone else a crack for a few games, just to see if they can make the step up (even if they average 25, it will be an improvement).
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
If Raqibul didn't toss his toys then Ashraful could possibly be on the sidelines already.

Thing is he is still a better player than Jahurul (he should prove himself to be better though) and Kayes. Bangladesh don't have huge depth but hopefully when we see Nafees and Raqibul back in the team a guy like Ashraful can actually be dropped.
 

Aritro

International Regular
As Athlai said, Raqibul being suspended has freed up a spot for his re-call. Another factor in Ashraful's favour is that Siddons, for some bizzare reason, really seems to rate him and has been lobbying for his continued selection.

I suspect he thinks that he can be the coach that turns him around and helps Ashraful convert superb reflexes and hand-eye co-ordination into actual output, but like all the coaches before him, he's mistaken.

Averages of 16, 12, and 16 in the last three years are ****ing deplorable and there's got to be at least a dozen batsmen who could be brought in and expected to do better.

Time to banish him from the test team forever.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's awful. It's amazing how many people still think of him as a mercurial talent when he's just a really, really bad player. If he even appeared to make any effort to either apply himself to building a test innings or improve his game then I might not speak so harshly of him. But he doesn't.
 
Last edited:

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
How Ashrafail keeps being selected and when he is placed in an important position when better players are moved to accomodate him is beyond me.
 

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
He's awful. It's amazing how many people still think of him as a mercurial talent when he's just a really, really bad player. If he even appeared to make any effort to either apply himself to building a test innings or improve his game then I might not speak so harshly of him. But he doesn't.
Nah, still a mercurial talent, perhaps even the definition of it. Incredible hand-eye co-ord. But nothing else.

Can't help thinking how much those innings against Sri Lanka and Australia could potentially have destroyed him as a player. You couldn't have played either of those innings without a substantial amount of talent. Some of his shots at Cardiff were just incredible - some of them pretty orthodox as well. But he was very young then and completely immature, which was more understandable by now. He was given the captaincy while in a bad trough of form and then has sunk to unchartered depths. It's almost like he wasn't given the chance to grow up and so lacks the mental ability to bat, while his batting has gone to pot at the same time.

It's also frightening that he made his Test debut as a legspinner when you see what he does these days...

Hopefully Raqib will come back into the side within the next year and the likes of Shahriar Nafees, Alok Kapali, Mahmudul Hasan, Nasir Hossain all come through (or back through, in the case of the first two).
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Going with Uppercut here.

Pretty much every time I've seen Ashraful bat he looks bad. Not "wow, what a dumb dismissal for a talented player"- he just looks bad. Throughout his innings.

Only guy I've ever seen repeatedly owned by Scott Styris bouncers on slow Bangladeshi tracks ffs.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Going with Uppercut here.

Pretty much every time I've seen Ashraful bat he looks bad. Not "wow, what a dumb dismissal for a talented player"- he just looks bad. Throughout his innings.

Only guy I've ever seen repeatedly owned by Scott Styris bouncers on slow Bangladeshi tracks ffs.
:laugh:


Yeah, in one respect he is immensely talented, but then again, hand-eye co-ord and feet movement are not the only talents to make a good batsman.. YOu need judgement, a decent defense etc..
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lol JJ, he doesn't have good hand-eye co-ordination. If he did he wouldn't completely miss the ball with 75% of his shots.
 
Last edited:

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
Lol JJ, he doesn't have good hand-eye co-ordination. If he did he wouldn't completely miss the ball with 75% of his shots.
Nah, that's technical issues. And mental issues. To play those shots over fine-leg and the inside-out over cover so well like he did in the '05 series requires amazing hand-eye.

Shame the first two issues I mentioned are 99% of batting though.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I disagree. You could argue that there isn't sufficient evidence to say he has bad hand-eye co-ordination but there's absolutely no way you can say he has good hand-eye co-ordination given how rarely he hits the ball with the middle of the bat. His hand-eye co-ordination is on a lower level than that of someone like Graeme Swann.

That isn't to say he isn't also awful at the mental and technical side of batting, though.
 
Last edited:

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
I disagree. You could argue that there isn't sufficient evidence to say he has bad hand-eye co-ordination but there's absolutely no way you can say he has good hand-eye co-ordination given how rarely he hits the ball with the middle of the bat. His hand-eye co-ordination is on a lower level than that of someone like Graeme Swann.

That isn't to say he isn't also awful at the mental and technical side of batting, though.
I meant more he's played shots in the past which demanded a very high level of co-ord simply because they were so risky and because his technique was hardly foolproof back then. Maybe it's deteriorated horribly since then. I'm just interested in the reasons why he's gone backward so far - there's absolutely no way he could play one of those innings now.
 

cricman

International 12th Man
Ash used to be I'll score a ***y 25 and than gone.

I'll give you guys the 411 on what happened with Ash, When Jamie came on to he tried to change some of the technical aspects of his Batting, more specifically his back lift. Ash hasn't been comfortable with the change and the runs have stopped. So he got dropped for the home tour of England and now he's gone back to his old technique and style ... More Hand Eye, offer him a little width and he'll throw the the Kitchen Sink at the Ball.

I thought he looked very good (better than he's looked in some time) before England took the New Ball and than he was in 2 minds.
 

Sir Alex

Banned
Such a dire influence on his team. If such a terrible cricketer can play 55 test matches before 26 (and threatening much more), how can other cricketers be motivated to excel?

Just was browsing through that excuse of a batting record and noted he scored 272 runs from 9 tests (17 innings) in 2008, and that included a hundred as well!! All at a princely average of 16.00. Is it the lowest average in a calendar year to include a century??
 

stumpski

International Captain
Just was browsing through that excuse of a batting record and noted he scored 272 runs from 9 tests (17 innings) in 2008, and that included a hundred as well!! All at a princely average of 16.00. Is it the lowest average in a calendar year to include a century??
Ajit Agarkar springs to mind ...
 

Top