Cricket Player Manager

View Poll Results: Who would win in a five match ODI series?

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll
  • Team 1

    10 76.92%
  • Team 2

    0 0%
  • Too close to call

    3 23.08%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Which of these two teams would win in a five match ODI series?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    1,221

    Which of these two teams would win in a five match ODI series?

    Team 1

    1.AC Gilchrist
    2.SR Tendulkar
    3.RT Ponting
    4.V Richards
    5.M Bevan
    6.C Cairns
    7.S Pollock
    8.W Akram
    9.M Murali
    10.J Garner
    11.G Mcgrath

    Team 2

    1.S Jayasuriya
    2.M Hayden
    3.B Lara
    4.J Miandad
    5.A Symonds
    6.L Klusener
    7.MS Dhoni
    8.I Khan
    9.S Warne
    10.W Younus
    11.C Ambrose

  2. #2
    State 12th Man 0RI0N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Groom Lake
    Posts
    703
    1 Build a time machine.
    2 Collect all players at their respective peaks.
    3 Assemble them at a point in teh future to play 5 ODI's.
    4 ????
    5 profit
    Team 1 wins 3 - 2

  3. #3
    Global Moderator Teja.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    z
    Posts
    6,569
    IMO If only their peaks are considered, due to Waqar being so Gun in his peak, it gives Team B an advantage, and they will win 3-2 . If overall record is considered, Team A, 3-2.
    Last edited by Teja.; 12-04-2010 at 09:51 PM.

  4. #4
    Cricketer Of The Year The Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Teja. View Post
    IMO If only their peaks are considered, due to Waqar being so Gun in his peak, it gives Team B an advantage, and they will win 3-2 . If overall record is considered, Team I, 3-2.
    You think the 9th XI would beat both these teams?
    Member of the Twenty20 is Boring Society

    Quote Originally Posted by grecian View Post
    C'mon Man U.
    RIP Craigos


  5. #5
    U19 12th Man
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london
    Posts
    206
    Oh my God did you just put Andrew Symonds in one of those teams.

    He has to be one of the most overrated cricketers of all time!!!

    You couldnt come up with anyone better

  6. #6
    State Regular GuyFromLancs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    946
    Team 1 either 3-2 or more likely 4-1. Almost the perfect ODI XI really.
    World XI Since 1990 -

    1. Gooch 2. Dravid 3. Ponting 4. Tendulkar 5. Lara 6. Kallis 7. Gilchrist 8. Akram 9. Warne 10. Ambrose 11. McGrath

  7. #7
    International Captain Himannv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SL
    Posts
    6,237
    Almost impossible to say IMO.. At their peaks, any one of them can be devastating. Sanath, Viv, Gilchrist, and a few others have a tendency of being devastating with almost no warning and can pull off a victory almost single handedly. Same could be said of those bowlers, on their day, many are unplayable. Just to compare and contrast them here:

    1. Team 2 bats far deeper than Team 1.

    2. Team 1 has more strike bowling options than Team 2. (5 would be enough though, surely a superior batting allrounder would be a better option at 6 for Team 1). Better bowling attack on the whole IMO.

    3. Both teams have players who are not playing in their best position. On the whole I think its best to play those players in their best position.

  8. #8
    Hall of Fame Member NZTailender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
    Posts
    19,608
    Team one contains more consistent players than team two, so team one it is.

    Edit: to expand, team one seems to be full of the 'top level' greats, whereas most of the players (well, batsmen) in team two are in that level just below.

    But probably too close to call...


    [/indecisive] Not a bad thread, actually.
    Last edited by NZTailender; 12-04-2010 at 05:04 PM.
    President of SKAS - Kat is King | Proud member of CVAAS - One of the best | LRPLTAS - Rosco rocks!
    The NZTailender Supporting XI:
    H Rutherford, T Latham, N Broom, M Bracewell, D Brownlie, BJ Watling, D de Boorder+, M Henry, B Wheeler, H Bennett, A Milne
    Go Tigers!
    R.I.P. Fardin & Craig

  9. #9
    State Regular GuyFromLancs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by Avada Kedavra View Post
    Team 1

    1.AC Gilchrist
    2.SR Tendulkar
    3.RT Ponting
    4.V Richards
    5.M Bevan
    6.C Cairns
    7.S Pollock
    8.W Akram
    9.M Murali
    10.J Garner
    11.G Mcgrath

    Team 2

    1.S Jayasuriya
    2.M Hayden
    3.B Lara
    4.J Miandad
    5.A Symonds
    6.L Klusener
    7.MS Dhoni
    8.I Khan
    9.S Warne
    10.W Younus
    11.C Ambrose
    Okay, let's take it face value.

    Gilchrist v S Jayasuriya

    Not too disimilar in the roles they played. Both can win matches on their own but I would back Gilly for consistency.

    1-0 Team 1

    Tendulkar v Hayden

    Hayden was curiously out of favour in ODIs for a while. Despite his power he sometimes looked uncomfortable being rushed. To be honest, no-one compares with SRT in this format.

    2-0 Team 1

    Lara V Ponting

    An odd one, because despite Lara having the even greater talent and being more of a destructive batsman as a rule, Ponting has had the better ODI career.

    3-0 Team 1

    Richards V Javed

    I don't comment too much on players I know very little of, but the records and reputation would favour Viv.

    4-0 team 1

    Bevan v Symonds

    Tough because I really rate Symonds in this format. But the way Bev used to time the scoring at the back end of an innings was awe inspiring. He was inhuman for a time.

    5-0 team 1

    Cairns v Lance

    I'll go with Lance here as he seemed born to play one-day cricket. Although I rated Cairns very highly as a player.

    5-1 team 1.

    Pollock v Dhoni

    Tough because one is a batsman who now plays as a finisher and the other is a bowling allrounder. I'll sit on the fence.

    Still 5-1 team 1

    Akram v Khan

    I'll go with Wasim out of personal choice and the fact that he bowled in an era when batsmen started to really take control.

    6-1 team 1

    Murali v Warne

    Warne had a very good ODI career but leggies weren't meant for this format and Warne, IMO, was too arrogant to fully accept the role of container at times, much like in today's IPL. Murali has no problem bowling a very negative line when required.

    7-1 Team 1

    Garner v Younis

    Garner's record is too good to ignore but Waqar could win games on his own. I'll sit on the fence (again)

    Still 7-1 team 1

    Ambrose V Mcgrath

    I would just side with Mcgrath, despite Ambrose's better economy, as I consider Pig the greatest fast bowler in the past 20 years and possibly a fair bit beyond that.

    Final result in the flawed analysis = 8-1 to team 1
    Last edited by GuyFromLancs; 12-04-2010 at 05:39 PM.

  10. #10
    Cricketer Of The Year zaremba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Burgess Hill
    Posts
    8,995
    This thread might need to be merged with t'other, from which it originally sprang of course.

    As I wrote in the other thread, Team 1 has too many bowlers for my liking. 6 front-line bowlers plus 4 part-timers. You could fit another batsman in there easily and you'd have the greatest ODI team in history. Whereas Team 2 has only got 5 front-line bowlers if you count Klusener as the 5th.

    That said the point of the thread is how hard it is to pick between a 1st XI and 2nd XI - and indeed it is pretty tough to pick which of these would win. Team 1, maybe, but only maybe imho. And if you rebalance the teams then it might be even harder to call.

  11. #11
    vcs
    vcs is offline
    International Coach vcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    India
    Posts
    10,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Avada Kedavra View Post
    Team 1

    1.AC Gilchrist
    2.SR Tendulkar
    3.RT Ponting
    4.V Richards
    5.M Bevan
    6.C Cairns
    7.S Pollock
    8.W Akram
    9.M Murali
    10.J Garner
    11.G Mcgrath

    Team 2

    1.S Jayasuriya
    2.M Hayden
    3.B Lara
    4.J Miandad
    5.A Symonds
    6.L Klusener
    7.MS Dhoni
    8.I Khan
    9.S Warne
    10.W Younus
    11.C Ambrose
    Depends on the conditions. If the match is held in dry subcontinent conditions, Team 2 will win. I think Jayasuriya and Hayden might be the better opening pair in that case, Miandad and Dhoni are very good at rotating the strike and going after the spinners and Waqar for the reverse swing in the middle/death overs. If the series is played in seaming conditions with a hint of bounce with the ball coming on to the bat, Team A will have the edge. None better than McGrath, Akram, Pollock to exploit that and I believe the batsmen in Team A (bar Lara) suit those conditions better as well. Sachin, Gilly, Ponting, Richards are more technically solid and can get more runs off textbook shots than Jayasuriya, Hayden, Miandad, Dhoni.

  12. #12
    vcs
    vcs is offline
    International Coach vcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    India
    Posts
    10,305
    None of that is based on records and stats by the way, before someone pulls me up with actual numbers indicating that my assumptions are wrong.

  13. #13
    State Regular GuyFromLancs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    946
    If you swapped Hayden with Tendulkar you are talking evens stevens here.

  14. #14
    Cricketer Of The Year zaremba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Burgess Hill
    Posts
    8,995
    And who'd win a 5-match Test series between these same teams? I honestly couldn't choose between them.

  15. #15
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend andyc's Avatar
    Yeti Sports 1.5 Champion!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    23,864
    Quote Originally Posted by trapol View Post
    Oh my God did you just put Andrew Symonds in one of those teams.

    He has to be one of the most overrated cricketers of all time!!!

    You couldnt come up with anyone better
    An average of almost 40, while striking above 90, and being able to offer amazing fielding and a few overs in the middle? He was never an amazing Test player, but he's one of the best in ODIs.
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Only a bunch of convicts having been beaten 3-0 and gone 9 tests without a win and won just 1 in 11 against England could go into the home series saying they will win. England will win in Australia again this winter as they are a better side which they have shown this summer. 3-0 doesn't lie girls.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Great Test Matches..
    By Neil Pickup in forum General
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 04-10-2010, 08:17 PM
  2. Non Test Playing Nations!!!
    By laksh_01 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 1155
    Last Post: 18-10-2009, 07:55 AM
  3. Mouth-watering analysis this
    By Zinzan in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 09-05-2009, 01:06 AM
  4. Test Captains- an in-depth look
    By Xuhaib in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-01-2009, 06:43 AM
  5. WCL - Global Division 5, Jersey May 2008
    By laksh_01 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 114
    Last Post: 02-06-2008, 02:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •