Streetwise
Banned
Pakistan have the most potential followed by NZ.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Who will be the next side to win a test series against the top 4?
- Thread starter WindieWeathers
- Start date
Migara
Cricketer Of The Year
Not a huge fan of that facility
Faisal1985
International Vice-Captain
With the 2Ms bowling in top-moderately good form, SL is the team to look at. However, i would never rule Pakistan out. Despite the bans, i think its is imperative to have YK and MoYo in that Pak middle order....
Himannv
International Coach
I'm not Pakistani, but I think Pakistan in full flow is a very formidable opponent. Wish they stop having cricket balls for brunch though.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Even when England have beaten Australia and drawn in South Africa recently? i'd beg to differ.
You played India the other day and got a beating, one could argue that WI were more competitive in Australia than SL were in India.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Lol even NZ fans wouldn't agree with your warped point of view!!.. keep hating on WI though!!, it's funny.
yeah they will certainly be better than any of the bottom tier (nz,wi,pak) teams when they play to their potential for sure and this is coming from a kiwi fan
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Lol sorry but your living in the clouds if you seriously think if all teams play to their potential that WI are below SL, Pak and NZ, when we last played to our potential we destroyed England at sabina park to take the first test, that was a year ago, NZ haven't beaten a top side in 8 years, Pakistan haven't beaten a top side in 4 years, so the stats clearly don't comply with your notion.
Athlai
Not Terrible
We also beat England last time they toured us. Shocker.
And when we beat India at home was 8 years ago. And we beat SA in a Test at home as well.
Last edited:
Last edited:
don't be silly athlai ok. the only games that matter are the ones that wi win.
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Lost the series though, while I don't agree with his general point, is it not series he is referring to?
Athlai
Not Terrible
Not how I read it. Especially since besides Taylor in Sabina park that series was absolutely rubbish.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
What eight years ago Athlai? come on man you're clutching at straws there!!, if you wanna to talk about distant history then WI run over every other side in the game!!, full stop
.
Athlai
Not Terrible
You brought up the 8 years number, factually you'd only be correct to say we haven't won a Test series against Aus, Eng, Ind or SA in 7 years.What eight years ago Athlai? come on man you're clutching at straws there!!, if you wanna to talk about distant history then WI run over every other side in the game!!, full stop
WindieWeathers
International Regular
EXACTLY, i've clearly been talking about winning a test series, not winning a single test and still losing the series!!
.
WindieWeathers
International Regular
Yes Athlai that's what i was talking about, NZ haven't beaten those sides in around eight years, Pakistan haven't beaten any of those sides in four years, SL last beat one of them two years ago, while we beat England last year.
wi barely won that series though. i'd say eng were far superior in that series but were just unlucky.EXACTLY, i've clearly been talking about winning a test series, not winning a single test and still losing the series!!