BoyBrumby
Englishman
Trott?Ah what was that warwikshire dudes name? Forgot but he looks promising, mind you, never gives his wicket away.
Trott?Ah what was that warwikshire dudes name? Forgot but he looks promising, mind you, never gives his wicket away.
Did you watch the series in South Africa?Ah what was that warwikshire dudes name? Forgot but he looks promising, mind you, never gives his wicket away.
It's obviously Pietersen and you know it.African born? =/ Humour/intelligence fail.
Between Pietersen and Greig for me. I'd probably go for Pietersen though. Been top class for England, and he's still got a good few years left in him. Expecting him to finish his career as one of England's greats.
He has a strong case, but so does Tahnny. Any bloke who can average over 40 with the bat (in an era generally reckoned to be worse for batting than the current one), a bit over 30 with the ball and bowl medium-fast and off-spin is always going to be a useful player.It's obviously Pietersen and you know it.
Useful player, but not alltime great material which Pietersen potentially is.He has a strong case, but so does Tahnny. Any bloke who can average over 40 with the bat (in an era generally reckoned to be worse for batting than the current one), a bit over 30 with the ball and bowl medium-fast and off-spin is always going to be a useful player.
Without Tony Greig what might have become of England in 1974/75 doesn't bear thinking about - for me KP still has a bit to do to get past him - I'd put KP just ahead of Alan Lamb and level with Robin SmithUseful player, but not alltime great material which Pietersen potentially is.
Suppose you could ditch Chris Smith and move his brother up to open, which I think he did once or twice.Cant ignore Hick, surely?
What he had done domestically is worth a slot IMO
An African-born XI?
1) Strauss*
2) CL Smith
3) RA Smith
4) Pietersen
5) Lamb
6) D'Oliveria
7) AW Greig
8) Prior+
9) Pringle
10) Edmonds
11) Radford
Bowling's a bit light, but bats a long way down.
Of that lot, I wonder how many were genuinly African-raised and how many were Brits who happened to be born in Africa.Cant ignore Hick, surely?
What he had done domestically is worth a slot IMO
ThisWithout Tony Greig what might have become of England in 1974/75 doesn't bear thinking about - for me KP still has a bit to do to get past him - I'd put KP just ahead of Alan Lamb and level with Robin Smith
Out of the current lot, only Ponting, Tendulkar, Dravid and Kallis are better then Pietersen. I'd say his a bit better then Robin Smith and Alan Lamb.Without Tony Greig what might have become of England in 1974/75 doesn't bear thinking about - for me KP still has a bit to do to get past him - I'd put KP just ahead of Alan Lamb and level with Robin Smith
Not sure about that - would agree if you'd said "have been" rather than "are"Out of the current lot, only Ponting, Tendulkar, Dravid and Kallis are better then Pietersen.
I have to accept that I do have a very effective pair of rose tinted spectacles but Smith was a special player at international level for rather longer than KP has been so farI'd say his a bit better then Robin Smith and Alan Lamb
What yardstick are you using to measure this. Obviously not the current ICC rankings?Out of the current lot, only Ponting, Tendulkar, Dravid and Kallis are better then Pietersen. I'd say his a bit better then Robin Smith and Alan Lamb.
Because no other batsman dominated Warne and McGrath like Pietersen did. He looks at ease at the crease and looks like the sort've batsman that would be considered an alltime great batsman.What yardstick are you using to measure this. Obviously not the current ICC rankings?
Pietersen was world ranked No 1 for a short time in 2005 and has been drifting down the ratings ever since. That doesn't stand comparison with the likes of Ponting and Kallis.Because no other batsman dominated Warne and McGrath like Pietersen did. He looks at ease at the crease and looks like the sort've batsman that would be considered an alltime great batsman.