slugger
State Vice-Captain
Bigger bash but what about baggy green?
20/20 teams to be city based eg. Perth, Brisbane... in the 2011/12 comp.
20/20 teams to be city based eg. Perth, Brisbane... in the 2011/12 comp.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Sweeping changes ahead for Austalia.
- Thread starter slugger
- Start date
We've all heard the argument as to why Australian cricket is stronger due to competition for a place in the domestic team, and 6 teams fits perfectly for that. Twenty20 should be treated as what it is - hit and giggle for the crowds, and it shouldn't be taken so seriously.
Keep the state sides. I'd prefer to see NSW vs Victoria than Perth vs Gold Coast any day. Australian cricket has always been State vs State and should stay that way. As stated in the article, Brad Hodge may end up playing for Sydney or Perth, and that wouldn't be good for him nor his fans. They'd be torn between supporting the Melbourne team and one of their favourite batsmen. It just wouldn't work.
And then they might have to cut back the Sheffield Shield, which is ridiculous. Test cricket is and always should be the premier form of the game, not this Twenty20 rubbish, and we should be focussing on getting players to the baggy green, not an IPL franchise.
Don't like the idea at all.
[/traditionalist rant]
Keep the state sides. I'd prefer to see NSW vs Victoria than Perth vs Gold Coast any day. Australian cricket has always been State vs State and should stay that way. As stated in the article, Brad Hodge may end up playing for Sydney or Perth, and that wouldn't be good for him nor his fans. They'd be torn between supporting the Melbourne team and one of their favourite batsmen. It just wouldn't work.
And then they might have to cut back the Sheffield Shield, which is ridiculous. Test cricket is and always should be the premier form of the game, not this Twenty20 rubbish, and we should be focussing on getting players to the baggy green, not an IPL franchise.
Don't like the idea at all.
[/traditionalist rant]
They got 41,000 for Victoria vs Queensland (or whatever), 29,000 for NSW vs Queensland and nearly that same amount for NSW vs SA. The people are turning up already, there aren't many more who would go to a domestic game. And surely NSW vs Queensland would draw more than Brisbane vs Sydney. It sounds like a Grade game, not FC cricket.
Yeah, the stars will be there, but I'm not convinced it would improve the quality of cricket. Think about it, if NSW had all of their international stars, guys like Moises Henriques, Mitch Starc, Josh Hazelwood, Usman Khawaja and Ben Rohrer wouldn't gat a game. I still think that the exciting, young players from each state make the Big Bash what it is.
Yeah, there'll be new players, but really, would a Victorian batsman playing for Sydney really have his heart in it? Would Brad Hodge want to play for Brisbane, after making Victorian cricket what it is over the last 15 years? Why not keep the teams together, where they play better through knowing one another's strengths and weaknesses.
They could easily move a NSW game to Canberra, a SA Game to Alice Springs, a WA game to Darwin and a QLD game to Cairns. You have 17 games in total, more than enough to share around the venues.
If they want to, go ahead and expand the T20 competition, but leave the teams the same and don't make the Sheffield Shield suffer because of it. They're overcomplicating the whole issue. There's nothing broken, so why fix it?
Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
In light of crowd numbers other state cricket and Tests the last few years, have no idea how you can draw that conclusion.
Disagree that players in other teams wouldn't have their hearts in it either. You're essentially saying that Afridi, Pollard, Rana, etc. don't have their hearts in it because it's not their home team. Think they're all amongst the best players this year (Afridi probably hasn't done as much with the bat as he'd like this year but has been excellent with the ball) so I'm guessing they're putting in. The whole state of origin thing is overblow, tbh. Doesn't seem to hurt AFL and, in fact, state of origin football died because no-one was coming to the games.
Think this is a reflection of your attitude towards the game, that it's hit and giggle stuff. It's getting taken more and more seriously by players and crowds alike I think you'll find. Blokes like Clarke and Ponting come across more as dinosaurs than defenders of the baggy green with their casual attitude towards it.
Last edited:
Shield games are never going to draw crowds, its been that way for longer than most can remember. But a lack of crowd numbers doesn't mean they aren't important. If we put Twenty20 interests ahead of Shield interests, we're putting Test cricket 2nd in the long run. We need the full home-and-away Shield calendar to keep the Test depth there. And weren't test numbers pretty good this year, considering that WI and Pakistan series' aren't the biggest.
Yeah, but half the AFL clubs are Victorian anyhow, and State of Origin is by no means dead. 80,000+ per game isn't too shabby... I think I lose this argument...
Yep, it is my attitude, and isn't the whole point of these forums to express attitudes and opinions and discuss them? I understand people are taking it more seriously, I just think there's a difference between taking it seriously and overkill.
If CA's planners can find time for a full home-and-away T20 schedule, I'm all for it. As much as I don't like it, it is the future of the game. I just don't want Test cricket to suffer because of it. Extend the season if you have to, run it from October through April if you want, just don't jeopardise the Sheffield Shield and the future of Australia in Test cricket for some extra cash.
Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
True but I don't think that's happening. That said, something to keep in mind for sure.
To be honest, I'm hopeful we'll see more people coming through the gate for Shield/FRC games with local players getting more exposure through the Big Bash. Would be fantastic if that happened.
Some days, yeah. It's a far cry from when crowd numbers were good no matter who OZ were playing, though. They were winning more, though.
Haha, yeah wasn't having a go at your attitude just commenting on your attitude towards T20. TBH, hate how that word is always used negatively these days.
Yep. I just don't think that's happening yet. The death of 5-Test series against anyone not named England is a bit annoying but, tbh, very few others lived up to the billing so I think CA are just being smart about it. That said, I don't think any series being played permanently be designated 3-Tests only. OZ vs India really could make for an entertaining 5-Test series and, if it fits in, should be considered.
Yeah, as soon as we do that we're in real trouble. Test cricket has to stay #1, even if T20 brings in the money for the boards.
Yeah, that's the positive of the Big Bash. I went to the NSW/QLD game, and despite it being shortened by rain, it really opened up a couple of my friends eyes towards guys like Khawaja and Starc. I already knew about them, being a part of this, but they didn't and now they can see the next generation of Australian cricketers. My attitude to T20 shifted after seeing these plans. Its a bit of fun to go to and introduce new people, but the resources should go where it really matters - improving tests.
Going back to the mid-70's, the crowd behaviour rules were more relaxed, so people were bringing in beer, doing mexican waves and having fun. However, now, they've tightened it all up and people tend to enjoy themselves less. I think that was the thing with that T20 game I attended, security threw beach balls back, the mexican waves were happening and nobody was all that bothered. At Tests though, they take a much more serious approach. It isn't receptive to crowd numbers. And back then, Australia was successful, but the Windies, India, England and whoever else came over were always competitive, and the crowds loved them for it.Some days, yeah. It's a far cry from when crowd numbers were good no matter who OZ were playing, though. They were winning more, though.
Then in the 2000s we dominated everyone, and the crowds loved it. But now its getting competitive again and nobody is used to seeing Australia fight. Once they realise how good the cricket becomes, numbers should increase again. The Sydney, Hobart and Perth Tests from this year are perfect examples. Australia won all of them, but they looked in serious trouble in Sydney and Hobart, and the Windies pushed them to the limit in WA, and as far as I know the crowds loved it. It was great cricket.
Yeah, that's how I meant to respond to it. And I agree about the negativity surrounding it.
Yeah, With the competitive cricket now, the India and South Africa series, at the least, should be 5 tests. Its just a shame that the Future Tours Thingo the ICC has stops that.Unless we adopt 8 test summers, it won't really work having 5 test series more often.
I think we will adjust to the changes.
Most the 20/20 crowd are newbies.
Imagine all the young new comers,maybe some from the under 19 side.
The youngsters are the great impact,the qld keeper has been a revealtion.
Imagine a canberra state of origin side,with overseas players.
Most the 20/20 crowd are newbies.
Imagine all the young new comers,maybe some from the under 19 side.
The youngsters are the great impact,the qld keeper has been a revealtion.
Imagine a canberra state of origin side,with overseas players.
G.I.Joe
International Coach
Haha, think that'll actually catch on as the cricketing equivalent of 'fudge!'Damn BCCI
Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
Haha I love it.
India's fault for all the ODIs, and then Aust vs. England play a 7 ODI series.
India's fault for the IPL, and now T20 league in Aust is going to likely have auctions and possibly franchises.
Last edited:
howardj
International Coach
Hate the City-based concept. They finally get something right, and they have to go and change it. I mean, what history do the Brisbane cricket team have for instance? Absolutely none. People are not vacuuous - they need to identify with their team. Why couldn't they just leave it the hell alone?
Anyway, RE the T20 crowds...
Word on the street is that many, many tickets have been freebies. I'm not saying it's not popular, but let's keep the crowd numbers in perspective.
Anyway, RE the T20 crowds...
Word on the street is that many, many tickets have been freebies. I'm not saying it's not popular, but let's keep the crowd numbers in perspective.
Streetwise
Banned
Looks like they are inserting another layer of administrators.
Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bit late butDamn BCCI
!
BoyBrumby
Englishman
I don't have any strong feelings one way or the other but if more teams are deemed a necessity I suppose cities are the obvious bases for them.
Having all the players up for grabs seems a bit soulless tho; would seem weird that a bloke like (say) Symonds who's played for QLD all his domestic career could end up in Perth or Adelaide. Would make more sense if the bigger states with two city teams in divided their playing rostas up between them to me.
Having all the players up for grabs seems a bit soulless tho; would seem weird that a bloke like (say) Symonds who's played for QLD all his domestic career could end up in Perth or Adelaide. Would make more sense if the bigger states with two city teams in divided their playing rostas up between them to me.