LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe whole "the sanctity of this, and every subsequent, poll has been compromised by zaremba putting Jardine at number 1" grumble that I've been picking up over the last few days.
The whole "the sanctity of this, and every subsequent, poll has been compromised by zaremba putting Jardine at number 1" grumble that I've been picking up over the last few days.
I see. Well in that case I was over it before it happened, but where's the fun in that. I promise not to mention it again..................................unless Grace isn't number 1.
Sadly I think the likelihood of Grace at 1 is limited. We can dream...
I know.....................you scurrilous poll wrecker.Originally Posted by zaremba
On the contrary, I daresay that by putting Grace at 2 and Bradman nowhere I have done more for WG's chances of securing the top spot than any other voter
I didn't mean that. I promised not to mention your wanton destruction of the voting system again as long as Grace was Number 1, which he won't be - so I mentioned it again.
I hope no one comes home and reads this thread after a night on the beer.
Yeah, I get the Bradman thing. I was just speculating about who else could have the 100% count. Has to be Sobers, for mine.
I know a place where a royal flush
Can never beat a pair
I think it might be Sachin Tendulkar actually. He ticks all the boxes IMO, firstly he's obviously one of the best cricketers, he's around now and you don't hear that many people hating him.
I'll be devo if Bradman is not number 1 btw, it will not be that easy for him to catch up 25 points, maybe.
Almost everyone will have him at 1, and his competition is split. I think he'll be ok.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote