• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan in Australia

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Interesting that you leave Siddle out, i'm not disagreeing, but surely you couldn't leave out Bollinger now. It makes the selection table very interesting.
I maintained at the time of his initial selection that Siddle should not have been picked over Bollinger or Noffke anyway. Noffke has since gone off the boil and suffered greatly from injury, but nothing since then has convinced me that Siddle is a better bowler than Bollinger.

Siddle has a lot more potential as a bowler than anyone else in Australian cricket at the moment except Johnson. If Johnson keeps bowling like he did in this test I wouldn't be surprised to see him take 400 test match wickets at 25. If he reverts to his Lords form though we'll be lucky to see 250 wickets at 35.
 

Rant0r

International 12th Man
Poor old Noffke must wonder what he's done wrong, his time has probably passed now. I'm still flabbergasted to see fast bowlers picked from nowhere seemingly cue jumping. Although i'm a big fan of Siddle. Bollinger has been scaring batsmen in the Shield Comp for a few years now.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Surely you're not going to pick him on 4 overs of McCricket ?

But seriously, did he actually look like he was landing them ok ?
I'm not suggesting at all he play Test Cricket anytime soon. Just that I think he may have turned a corner. :)
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I'm not suggesting at all he play Test Cricket anytime soon. Just that I think he may have turned a corner. :)
Yeah, tend to agree actually. I mean, it's completely possible he just had an uncharacteristically good day but the whole package did look a lot better in general. Looked like his hips and his shoulders were on the same brainwave for the first time for a start, and as was mentioned he had a bit more momentum into his delivery. Still think it's a complete joke he's in the squad as a bowler mind you but just from a development POV he looked a lot better.
 
Last edited:

Matt79

Global Moderator
Yeah, tend to agree actually. I mean, it's completely possible he just had an uncharacteristically good day but the whole package did look a lot better in general. Looked like his hips and his shoulders were on the save brainwave for the first time. Still think it's a complete joke he's in the squad as a bowler mind you but just from a development POV he looked a lot better.
Warne's a genius....
 

Matt79

Global Moderator
If Lee was fit and in form I'd definitely have him over both Siddle and Hilfenhaus, easily. I doubt he'll ever be at his best again though and his test career is almost certainly over.

But yeah, assuming he was bowling like he did in the Ashes warmup game for example, or for a year or two leading up to the tour of India last year, he'd be in Australia's best team. Lee/Bollinger/Johnson/Hauritz/Watson would be a hell of an attack.
Unfortunately at this stage, its looking increasingly likely that saying "if Lee was fully fit" is as realistic as saying "if McGrath were fifteen years younger".
 

Rant0r

International 12th Man
I'm not sure that I would pick a fully fit Lee over the current lot, but granted I have some bromance for Hilfenhaus and Bollinger
 

pasag

RTDAS
I'd pick a fully fit Lee in an instant. Johnson and Hauritz are stable and Watto's doing well so if things go horribly wrong you can sorta hide him. But if they go right = win. Lee will never play for Aus in whites again though.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Interesting that you leave Siddle out, i'm not disagreeing, but surely you couldn't leave out Bollinger now. It makes the selection table very interesting.
Dont have to leave him out. Pick him & have all 4-quicks & only pick Hauritz on real turner or similar flattish MCG type decks.
 

Jayzamann

International Regular
Can't understand why the notion of a second spinner was entertained (read: Smith) by the selectors. If anything, a turning deck in Sydney is an opportunity to let North actually do something instead of nearly lose his match fee when he doesn't score runs.
 

Rant0r

International 12th Man
Surely you wouldn't go into a test in Australia bar maybe Brisbane and Perth without a specialist spinner, even Perth these days actually.

Unsure why North and dare I say it Katich aren't being used, not that it made much difference in the most recent test.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Katich does not want to bowl many overs at all.

Given his age and the fact that the last time he had a poor run of form he got dropped can you really blame him for wanting to focus on what is by far his strongest discipline?
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Surely you wouldn't go into a test in Australia bar maybe Brisbane and Perth without a specialist spinner, even Perth these days actually.
Yea only Birsbane & Perth. I would say Perth was very lively this year compared some of the shocking roads that where present vs SA 05/06 & 08/09 .

Adelaide & Sydney you GOT to have a spinner there. MCG it depends on the day i guess, since in this decade there has been some fairly lively MCG decks at times.
 

Rant0r

International 12th Man
Perth was pretty docile this year as well, sadly I think it will never get back to where it was, they need to sack that useless curator, he's been there for years and keeps banging on about making it return to the old days but never does. Sadly the Australian Pitches now have a sameness, which leads to flat track bashing and no swing bowlers and spinners just get bashed
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Perth was pretty docile this year as well, sadly I think it will never get back to where it was, they need to sack that useless curator, he's been there for years and keeps banging on about making it return to the old days but never does. Sadly the Australian Pitches now have a sameness, which leads to flat track bashing and no swing bowlers and spinners just get bashed
The old days are probably exaggerated somewhat. However, I do still remember Ambrose' deadly spell. *shudder*
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Off my head i'd say Perth has played all-right this decade TBH. Has fluctuated alot though..

- vs WI 2000. It was quick, McGrath hat-trick vs WI & all
- vs NZ 01. A bit flat, but was a great test
- vs ENG 02. Quick, remember Lee hitting Alex Tudor
- vs ZIM 03. Oh yea that was road
- vs PAK 04. Quick again. McGrath's 8 for
- vs SA 05. Absolute road
- vs ENG 06. Quickish, flattened out at the end
- vs IND 07. Flattish, didn't live up to its pre-match hype with all the talk that Tait was going to kill IND.
- vs SA 08. Like ENG 06, started quick, ended up flattt
- vs WI 09. Quickish early, then got slower as the game went on.
 

Top