Haha yes. Think he only stayed in there till the end because Jono didn't post about him.No, he won't. Thread has jinxed him.
He's certainly made a telling contribution to the "batsmen don't win Test matches" debateHe could feasibly smash the WR and leave plenty of time for India to win, scary
Thought Bradman had three triple centuries?If he scores 16 runs, he breaks a record anyway. 1st batsman in test history to score 3 triple hundreds. 101 more after that and he breaks Lara's record. The way he bats, he could do it before tea tomorrow.
Nah just two. He also scored a 299*Thought Bradman had three triple centuries?
His 2 Headingley knocks and a 299*.Thought Bradman had three triple centuries?
Yup, totally.He's certainly made a telling contribution to the "batsmen don't win Test matches" debate
Didn't know that both of Bradman's 300s were scored at the same venue. That makes Sehwag the first batsman to make 300s at two different venues already then. Three, if he makes it tomorrow too.His 2 Headingley knocks and a 299*.
No batsman has scored more Test runs at Headingley than Don Bradman. I've yet to find another ground (outside grounds like Sophia Gardens in Cardiff that have hosted 1 Test) where the record run scorer is an overseas player.Didn't know that both of Bradman's 300s were scored at the same venue. That makes Sehwag the first batsman to make 300s at two different venues already then. Three, if he makes it tomorrow too.
Yeah, was thinking about this today. Richard will obviously come and say you still have to take 20 wickets but whatever. Sehwag makes as strong a case as possible for batsmen.He's certainly made a telling contribution to the "batsmen don't win Test matches" debate