• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Learie Constantine and WWII

shivfan

Banned
How do I edit a word in the link?
:unsure:
It's clearly an offensive term, even if it's the kind of treatment Constantine had to put up with in a hotel that was hosting segregated American soldiers....
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
In 1954 Constantine published a book called "Colour Bar" about racism in which he dealt with this incident in less than a page - in the 21st century the book is quite disturbing but does at least demonstrate how much progress has been made since the war
 

shivfan

Banned
In 1954 Constantine published a book called "Colour Bar" about racism in which he dealt with this incident in less than a page - in the 21st century the book is quite disturbing but does at least demonstrate how much progress has been made since the war
Not just here in the UK, but also in terms of the segregation policies of the US, which is what the hotel incident was all about....

The hotel, as you know, was hosting white American soldiers, and they didn't want to share that with any black people.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
How do I edit a word in the link?
:unsure:
It's clearly an offensive term, even if it's the kind of treatment Constantine had to put up with in a hotel that was hosting segregated American soldiers....
IMO there's nothing wrong with the word being in the headline.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not just here in the UK, but also in terms of the segregation policies of the US, which is what the hotel incident was all about....

The hotel, as you know, was hosting white American soldiers, and they didn't want to share that with any black people.

When I was a student I read the case report out of curiosity and am pretty sure there was no suggestion of any American expressing a view - I think it was just the most unpleasant sounding Ms O'Sullivan off on a prejudiced frolic of her own - In court she denied using the word "******" but when asked in cross examination whether Constantine was in fact the man she was talking about she came out with "I can't be sure they all look the same to me these negroes" - "lamentable" was the judges description of her

As the article says there were no race relations laws at all in the those days but, legally, Constantine had a choice of three possible causes of action that being slander, which he probably felt was too risky, breach of contract, which wouldn't have attracted anything other than nominal damagesor the one he did choose, which is why the case is of no great legal significance, being that rarely litigated area of the common law as it relates to an innkeepers duty to receive guests - legal commentators have always taken the view that he chose that as it was the one area which could and indeed did establish the legal principle that the colour of a man's skin cannot amount to reasonable cause for refusing to accommodate him.

Learie Constantine was a great man who deserves to be remembered more than he is - and half a century on "Colour Bar" deserves to be read - it may be a period piece but it remains highly relevant
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
In 1954 Constantine published a book called "Colour Bar" about racism in which he dealt with this incident in less than a page - in the 21st century the book is quite disturbing but does at least demonstrate how much progress has been made since the war
It is quite scary looking back at the past through the prism of the twenty-first century, but in some ways cricket was in the vanguard of English multiculturalism; Ranji, Duleep & the Nawab of Pataudi snr all played tests for England before WW2. All the more groundbreaking when one considers the British Boxing Board of Control had an actual colour bar in operation that prevented non-white Britons fighting for titles until 1948 and Viv Anderson didn't become the first black English football international until 1978.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
It is quite scary looking back at the past through the prism of the twenty-first century, but in some ways cricket was in the vanguard of English multiculturalism; Ranji, Duleep & the Nawab of Pataudi snr all played tests for England before WW2. All the more groundbreaking when one considers the British Boxing Board of Control had an actual colour bar in operation that prevented non-white Britons fighting for titles until 1948 and Viv Anderson didn't become the first black English football international until 1978.
Yea. But i wonder with the WI cricket team being so strong back then, was black people in this country really interested in football in those days?
 

Dissector

International Debutant
This clip about Constantine is quite interesting in light of this thread. Quoting the description:

Unseen for many years, this documentary short was made by the Colonial Film Unit towards the end of WWII for overseas distribution. The film is silent - it would have been shown to audiences throug...
Unseen for many years, this documentary short was made by the Colonial Film Unit towards the end of WWII for overseas distribution. The film is silent - it would have been shown to audiences throughout Britain's Caribbean colonies, often in venues without sound equipment.

It profiles the Trinidadian cricketer Learie Constantine, who was among the best-paid sportsmen in Britain in the 1930s.

Early in the war he was asked to serve as a welfare officer for the Ministry of Labour and National Service, looking after the interests of African and Caribbean munitions workers. The film shows the day-to-day work of Constantine, meeting factory workers, listening to their problems, and taking part in a charity cricket match. (Stephen Bourne)
Clearly the film doesn't show all the challenges that Constatine faced. Incidentally the BFI videos on Youtube are quite fascinating. There are some nice sport clips including the Arthur Mold no-ball controversy of 1901 and football games in the early 20th century.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
It is quite scary looking back at the past through the prism of the twenty-first century, but in some ways cricket was in the vanguard of English multiculturalism; Ranji, Duleep & the Nawab of Pataudi snr all played tests for England before WW2..
I disagree. Ranji, Duleep, Pataudi etc played for England because they belonged to the Royal families of India, those Royal families that were friendly with British Empire. Both the Empire and the Princely states needed each other to pursue their common interest.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
I disagree. Ranji, Duleep, Pataudi etc played for England because they belonged to the Royal families of India, those Royal families that were friendly with British Empire. Both the Empire and the Princely states needed each other to pursue their common interest.
Ha ye this is true TBH. I remember my history teacher telling me something like this is high school.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
I disagree. Ranji, Duleep, Pataudi etc played for England because they belonged to the Royal families of India, those Royal families that were friendly with British Empire. Both the Empire and the Princely states needed each other to pursue their common interest.
They all were gentlemen of the ruling classes, yes, but their selections were entirely on cricketing merit and their race doesn't seem to have been an insurmountable barrier to achieving sporting success for England. When compared to other English sports cricket was relatively quick to embrace non-white players.

Not claiming those who govern (the MCC, essentially) have been perfect in this field, far from it. The D'Oliveira affair is the most infamous example of selectorial prevarication, but it's also worth noting that Subba Row was never selected to tour SA either.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
They all were gentlemen of the ruling classes, yes, but their selections were entirely on cricketing merit and their race doesn't seem to have been an insurmountable barrier to achieving sporting success for England. When compared to other English sports cricket was relatively quick to embrace non-white players.

Not claiming those who govern (the MCC, essentially) have been perfect in this field, far from it. The D'Oliveira affair is the most infamous example of selectorial prevarication, but it's also worth noting that Subba Row was never selected to tour SA either.
And we were quick to drop Duleep after the SA tourists complained about his presence in the 1st test in 1929. And Ranji didn't go there in the early 20th century although, tbf, there may have been other reasons why an amateur didn't want to tour in those days.

But yes, given attitudes at the time, our selections of Ranj & Duleep were astonishingly enlightened.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
CB Llewellyn played 15 times for South Africa between 1896 and 1912 and was of mixed race and the only non-white (I'm pretty sure - doubtless someone will correct me if I'm wrong) to be selected before 1992 - his skin colour was on the pale side, which doubtless eased the situation but his being mixed race wasn't a secret so it just goes to show that in those days if you were good enough they'd find a way to select you
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
CB Llewellyn played 15 times for South Africa between 1896 and 1912 and was of mixed race and the only non-white (I'm pretty sure - doubtless someone will correct me if I'm wrong) to be selected before 1992 - his skin colour was on the pale side, which doubtless eased the situation but his being mixed race wasn't a secret so it just goes to show that in those days if you were good enough they'd find a way to select you
Here he is

Charlie Llewellyn | South Africa Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | Cricinfo.com

Looks distinctly on the pale side in this picture, although not sufficiently so to avoid being treated appallingly by some of the rest of the SA cricketers iirc. I'd imagine he wouldn't have been remotely considered if black or Asian.


Interestingly, there was controversy over whether or not he was even of mixed race. His daughter seemed to think not, judging by the piece below which si pinched from another article on cricinfo ...

Patrick Allen's assertion that Lllewellyn was South Africa's first coloured cricketer was hotly disputed. In the same year it was published (1976), Llewellyn's own daughter, then still alive and resident in England, in a letter published in The Cricketer, refuted all claims that her father had been coloured, pointing out that both her parents and grandparents had been of "pure British stock". This disclaimer was also featured in Brian Crowley's book Cricket's Exiles and in several articles published in The Cricketer and elsewhere down the years.
 
Last edited:

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
South Africa's participation in international cricket has been bedevilled by racism and the political intervention of governments virtually from the beginning. In 1894 the formidable coloured fast bowler, H. 'Krom' Hendricks, was nominated for the first South African team to tour England but was finally omitted, at the behest of Cecil Rhodes, the Cape Prime Minister, on grounds of race.
Hendricks was of Malayan extraction - Walter Read who captained the English side in South Africa in 1891/92 thought he was the best bowler in the country
 

Top