Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Intrusive ads are ruining my cricket viewing

  1. #1
    International Debutant Dissector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,258

    Icon13 Intrusive ads are ruining my cricket viewing

    I am sure all the Indian posters know what I am talking about. I caught a bit of the test this morning and Neo Sports has plumbed new depths of intrusiveness and annoyance even by the standards of Indian sports channels. Every few balls they have to shrink the screen to show a logo. After a wicket they switch immediately to ads instead of showing a replay. And though it isn't an ad, they have an annoying full screen when they return to live cricket after a replay. And of course the replay itself itself is an opportunity to plaster a logo.

    Now I know that ads pay for the broadcasts but beyond a point they become counterproductive. Certainly the sheer annoyance and frequency of the ads makes me watch less cricket than I otherwise would. Is that what Neo wants?

    And the brands that do this need to re-think their marketing strategy.In moderation I can enjoy well-produced ads but constantly annoying me while watching cricket is damaging not promoting their brand.

  2. #2
    Soutie Langeveldt's Avatar
    Pinball Champion!
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    29,542
    Welcome to the future, cricket is a game which is now driven by money over substance, get used to it or find a different sport to obsess over..
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    Don't like using my iPod dock. Ruins battery life too much.
    Quote Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
    Thanks Dick Smith. Will remember to subscribe to your newsletter for more electronic fun facts.

    ****.

  3. #3
    Cricketer Of The Year Arjun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    8,368
    This has been raised a few times already, because this has persisted for over a decade. Things were a lot worse when Doordarshan had telecast rights to cricket in India. It's annoying, no doubt, but a lot better than it was then.

    That Dial C for Confrontation is a whole story by itself. I wonder what really is the plan behind that show.
    "Talent is nothing without opportunity"
    "You're not remembered for aiming at the target, but hitting it"

    Twenty20 used to be boring.

    Sponsored...by...nothing!!!

  4. #4
    International Debutant Dissector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Langeveldt View Post
    Welcome to the future, cricket is a game which is now driven by money over substance, get used to it or find a different sport to obsess over..
    See, the thing is that even from the point of view of making money it's a bad strategy. For one thing if the ads become really annoying they tend to drive away viewers who have lots of other entertainment choices. Secondly companies pay money to promote their brands and improve their image. Constantly stuffing your logo down the viewers' throats doesn't really do this. Focus on making creative, entertaining ads that viewers actually enjoy watching. Quality matters more than quantity and beyond a certain point quantity actually damages your brand.

    If the advertisers and channels showed just a bit of moderation everyone would be better off. Cricket fans would get a better viewing experience. Channels would get more viewers and advertisers would genuinely promote their brands instead of annoying fans.


  5. #5
    International Debutant Dissector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Arjun View Post
    This has been raised a few times already, because this has persisted for over a decade. Things were a lot worse when Doordarshan had telecast rights to cricket in India. It's annoying, no doubt, but a lot better than it was then.

    That Dial C for Confrontation is a whole story by itself. I wonder what really is the plan behind that show.
    The old DD coverage was terrible in terms of technical quality and commentary but I don't really remember intrusive ads popping up during the cricket itself; no doubt because they didn't have the technology. I think the problem is getting worse actually with a greater frequency of pop-ups. And my impression is that channels like ESPN/Star which used to be better are becoming almost as bad as the others.

  6. #6
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Have heard about this for a good few years. What I'd say is that people who have realised that there's much money to be made out of something generally tend to have the eyes go bigger than the stomach for a while (as we're seeing currently) then, eventually, realise they've gone too far and find the happy-medium.

    Hopefully eventually this will happen with the ads on Indian cricket saga.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  7. #7
    International Coach Shri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Arjun View Post
    This has been raised a few times already, because this has persisted for over a decade. Things were a lot worse when Doordarshan had telecast rights to cricket in India. It's annoying, no doubt, but a lot better than it was then.

    That Dial C for Confrontation is a whole story by itself. I wonder what really is the plan behind that show.
    Moments after India won the second Test, we were watching Tendulkar on a bike rather than on his team-mates.

    I will take the ad thanks.

  8. #8
    Banned Pratters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Posts
    20,793
    Indian broadcast of cricket is pathetic.

  9. #9
    Cricketer Of The Year Arjun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    8,368
    There's this Eng/SA game on TEN Sports, and at 23.3 overs, with Roelof about to bowl, I see what looks like a massive flash drive. Then, at 23.5 overs, the screen gets squashed for an ad graphic underneath.

    All channels have this problem. It isn't worse for any channel, and surely a lot better than those dark days of DD. We now have the ads around the footage, not running through it! So it is an annoyance, but nowhere a turn-off as in the DD/Sahara era.

  10. #10
    Cricketer Of The Year zaremba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Burgess Hill
    Posts
    8,991
    We've got it lucky in England. I suspect it has to do with the domination and influence of the ad-free BBC, and also state broadcasting regulations, but the intrusiveness of advertising in British commercial broadcasting is a fraction of what it is elsewhere. Even Sky is pretty good about it.

  11. #11
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,071
    I've watched some Indian feeds when I'm in Singapore (they have like three 24 hour cricket channels, wtf Foxtel? Get your act into gear) and yeah it can be ****ing irritating.


    What's getting ****ing woeful here in Australia is Betfair ads during the ACTUAL COVERAGE on Channel 9. Firstly, I am quite a big sports gambler (in terms of frequency, not necessarily stake) and secondly, I use Betfair. So I'm not anti-gambling or anything.

    But I do not need to know the odds of random markets every 30 minutes. Yes I understand that corporate sponsorship involves having to give up time on air, and add value to the company. But FFS.

    Plus one of the markets they advertised today was "WI highest runscorer - Gayle, Dowlin or any other batsmen"

    I was on that exact market when they showed it, there was $7 available for "any other batsmen" which was offered at - $2.20. At least choose a ****ing liquid market!
    Last edited by Jono; 27-11-2009 at 11:54 AM.
    "I am very happy and it will allow me to have lot more rice."

    Eoin Morgan on being given a rice cooker for being Man of the Match in a Dhaka Premier Division game.

  12. #12
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    20,146
    Could be worse, could be listening to that **** Tony Greig on channel 9.

    At least some of the Indian ads are funny. Wasim Akram's ad for the fake sugar is so bad it's brilliant.

  13. #13
    International Debutant Dissector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,258
    Quote Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
    We've got it lucky in England. I suspect it has to do with the domination and influence of the ad-free BBC, and also state broadcasting regulations, but the intrusiveness of advertising in British commercial broadcasting is a fraction of what it is elsewhere. Even Sky is pretty good about it.
    Yes that is my theory as well. The BBC sets high standards which shape audience expectations and constrain private channels as well. In India the state broadcaster is crap and heavily commercialized anyway.

  14. #14
    RTDAS pasag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Looking for milksteak
    Posts
    31,678
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissector View Post
    I am sure all the Indian posters know what I am talking about. I caught a bit of the test this morning and Neo Sports has plumbed new depths of intrusiveness and annoyance even by the standards of Indian sports channels. Every few balls they have to shrink the screen to show a logo. After a wicket they switch immediately to ads instead of showing a replay. And though it isn't an ad, they have an annoying full screen when they return to live cricket after a replay. And of course the replay itself itself is an opportunity to plaster a logo.

    Now I know that ads pay for the broadcasts but beyond a point they become counterproductive. Certainly the sheer annoyance and frequency of the ads makes me watch less cricket than I otherwise would. Is that what Neo wants?

    And the brands that do this need to re-think their marketing strategy.In moderation I can enjoy well-produced ads but constantly annoying me while watching cricket is damaging not promoting their brand.
    All spot on.

    From the little I've seen the Indian advertising industry seems to think bigger, louder is better. The ads during the cricket seem to just have a lot of shouting and seem very tacky. Advertising during play is smart, but there has to be a balance and subtlety to it and over-intrusivness can hurt a brand. I know there's a lot of competition to get noticed in India, but quality in terms of creativity should trump quantity. Was watching the NZ Dilmah tea party thingy the other day during lunch in the cricket and at one stage it did get a bit over the top which I think most people wouldn't have appreciated.

    That said, this Indian ad is brilliant - YouTube - Neo Sports Gas
    Rest In Peace Craigos
    2003-2012

  15. #15
    International Coach Shri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,178
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    Could be worse, could be listening to that **** Tony Greig on channel 9.

    At least some of the Indian ads are funny. Wasim Akram's ad for the fake sugar is so bad it's brilliant.
    The one with the guitar thing at the end?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Well it's not time to go, and first...
    By Richard in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 439
    Last Post: 09-06-2014, 12:12 AM
  2. #Link to Testing Forum#
    By Matteh in forum Testing Forum
    Replies: 3224
    Last Post: 15-07-2012, 03:31 AM
  3. The man who revolutionised cricket
    By C_C in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 15-06-2011, 11:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •