Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2009, 04:10 AM   #901 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Manee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Heaven
Posts: 8,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaly piscine View Post
I know Anderson has his fans but... just doesn't cut it for me. Need to be looking elsewhere methinks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeraintIsMyHero View Post
Much better Test bowler than ODIs. I'm certainly one of those 'fans' that you speak of but I wouldn't be too disappointed to see us try something else in the 50 over game. Don't know who though.
He tends to naturally swing the ball on to a line which is easy to hit. He doesn't often enough swing it away or in to the off stump, it is usually away to outside off and in to leg stump which means he can go for runs. The potential for improvement is there but, yeah, probably should be dropped, atm.
Manee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:10 AM   #902 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
four_or_six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,136
Jeff Thomson still looks very cool. I can't believe he's almost 60!
four_or_six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:11 AM   #903 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Manee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Heaven
Posts: 8,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by four_or_six View Post
Anderson and Sidebottom together I don't really like. And at the moment Sidebottom looks better.
Sidebottom has bowled beautifully, really troubled the Australians but perhaps bowled a bit too short. I feel that early wickets are crucial when you have such an early start.
Manee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:12 AM   #904 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
Scaly piscine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North East England
Posts: 18,541
Don't think Anderson has been good enough in Test cricket either.

It's fine if you were thinking there's more to come from this guy, but I don't see it with Anderson. I think this is about as good as he's going to get - an ambitious team would be looking for more than a guy who's averaging 30+ and vanishes for most of the game/series. He's more squad player quality.
__________________
National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th in 2009 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion
24 Hour Scrabble World Record Attempt for Charity, in aid of Daisy Chain and End Polio Now
Countdown Series 57 Champion
King of the Arcade
Reply from mods to my prank bans in public:
Reply from mods to my prank bans in private:


MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk
Scaly piscine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:12 AM   #905 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
four_or_six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manee View Post
Sidebottom has bowled beautifully, really troubled the Australians but perhaps bowled a bit too short. I feel that early wickets are crucial when you have such an early start.
Sidebottom looks a lot better in this match, with the new ball.
four_or_six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:21 AM   #906 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
Scaly piscine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North East England
Posts: 18,541
Watson would be a very dangerous batsman if he didn't just brainlessly slog/swipe at the bowling. He can basically score faster than the other bats without doing anything like that.
Scaly piscine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:21 AM   #907 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
four_or_six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,136
Boooooring, Watto out trying to get the run-rate up.
four_or_six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:21 AM   #908 (permalink)
Eternal Optimist
 
GIMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shake my tree where's the apple for me?
Posts: 43,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaly piscine View Post
Don't think Anderson has been good enough in Test cricket either.

It's fine if you were thinking there's more to come from this guy, but I don't see it with Anderson. I think this is about as good as he's going to get - an ambitious team would be looking for more than a guy who's averaging 30+ and vanishes for most of the game/series. He's more squad player quality.
Who would you pick instead?
__________________
Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they’ll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces

RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
GIMH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:24 AM   #909 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
four_or_six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,136
Excellent catch.

Pretty poor from Paine, that.
four_or_six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:25 AM   #910 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
inbox24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,091
Pretty poor stuff. Get ready for some test cricket for the next 10-25 overs if they stay in that long.
__________________
Inappropriate signature.
--Moderators
inbox24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:27 AM   #911 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
Scaly piscine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North East England
Posts: 18,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeraintIsMyHero View Post
Who would you pick instead?
Depends on the make-up of the side. Onions should be an automatic pick in Test cricket. Sidebottom *if* he's fit is a much more effective bowler than Anderson.

After that it's just a case of having a look at whichever promising players in county cricket.


Edit: He would still be in the squad, but you've got to be looking at other options because for me you can't just 'settle' for Anderson if you want to be a good side.

Last edited by Scaly piscine; 06-09-2009 at 04:30 AM.
Scaly piscine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:34 AM   #912 (permalink)
State Regular
 
Pizzorno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: St.Helens
Posts: 937
Lol at Watson getting himself in and then getting out again. Bit of a problem for him now; I count that as every innings of the tour he's done it in.
__________________
In affectionate remembrance of Australian cricket, which died at the Oval on 23rd August 2009. Deeply lamented by a large circle of criminals and bar staff. RIP.
Pizzorno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:40 AM   #913 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
inbox24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,091
Australia is rewinding to the 80s where scores of 200 were good enough to win games. Talk about living in the past, these guys are batting as if we have Warne, Murali and McGrath to get us home with the ball.
inbox24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:41 AM   #914 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
four_or_six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,136
Go Luke Wright

This Aussie batting line-up is missing Ponting so badly.
four_or_six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:41 AM   #915 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
inbox24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,091
Finally, Clarke out.

Fergie century pl0cks.
inbox24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goodwin for Australia iamdavid Cricket Chat 19 22-12-2003 05:55 PM
ODIs at Telstra Stadium Craig Cricket Chat 27 07-11-2003 02:05 AM
Aus Vs Numibia Eclipse World Cup 2003 8 27-02-2003 12:40 PM
Who Shoud bat 4 for Australia in ODI's age_master Cricket Chat 16 25-01-2003 05:27 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web