Hey all,
What do people think about the selection criteria (or apparent criteria) used by various countries.
Obviously, SA are in a bit of a schemozzle, and I really think that the Waugh brothers should have been retained until the World Cup.
Then I read that the Engalnd coach is concerned that players have fronted for a series in an unfit condition! Bloody hell, how "professional" is that?
I think the same thing happened with India, their Captain being rated as one of the most unfit.
Let's face it, it's the same as a local association. It's not good when one side dominates, and the general standard drops. If all teams are having a red hot go in all depts. the standard is high, and people will flock to contests. It must be good for cricket.
My 3 cents :-))
What do people think about the selection criteria (or apparent criteria) used by various countries.
Obviously, SA are in a bit of a schemozzle, and I really think that the Waugh brothers should have been retained until the World Cup.
Then I read that the Engalnd coach is concerned that players have fronted for a series in an unfit condition! Bloody hell, how "professional" is that?
I think the same thing happened with India, their Captain being rated as one of the most unfit.
Let's face it, it's the same as a local association. It's not good when one side dominates, and the general standard drops. If all teams are having a red hot go in all depts. the standard is high, and people will flock to contests. It must be good for cricket.
My 3 cents :-))