Cricket Player Manager
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: ECB scrap plans for new Twenty20 competition

  1. #1
    International 12th Man
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    1,709

    ECB scrap plans for new Twenty20 competition

    BBC SPORT | Cricket | Counties | ECB scraps plans for second T20

    Quote Originally Posted by BBC
    ECB scraps plans for second T20

    The England and Wales Cricket Board has opted for one enhanced Twenty20 competition in next season's cricket calendar as opposed to two.

    The ECB was considering having a P20 championship as well as the current Twenty20 Cup but decided against it after meeting county chiefs.

    A new T20 competition was the ECB's answer to the Indian Premier League.

    But the 2010 schedule will now include the LV County Championship, Friends Provident Trophy and Twenty20 Cup.

    "These were extremely constructive talks and the consensus of opinion was clearly for three competitions, with a desire to preserve the primacy of Test cricket and the LV County Championship," said ECB chief executive David Collier.

    Any extra T20 competition would have caused scheduling problems for the ECB, while attracting sponsors and broadcasters might have proved difficult in the current economic climate.

    The Twenty20 World Cup was staged in England this year and caused England's first Test of the series against West Indies to start early on 7 May.

    That is believed to have proved less than ideal and, with a similar scenario expected as England play two Test series each summer, the P20 has been scrapped.

    The new look Twenty20 Cup is now expected to be played throughout the whole season and predominantly on Thursdays, Fridays and at weekends.

    Details of how many overseas players permitted per county are yet to be announced by the ECB.

    The FPT is set to be put back a few weeks - starting in June - and will include quarter-final and semi-final stages, while the Championship is set to remain a 16-match campaign.
    Have to say I'm pleased. Having two T20 competitions in the summer was a thoroughly stupid idea in the first place. Hopefully they will now open up the current T20 Cup to more overseas players (say 4 per team) so that I maybe start to care about it a bit more. A happy byproduct of the T20 expansion is the elimination of the Pro 40 League which was another waste of space in my opinion. Still we'll never be able to do what English cricket really needs which is cull some of the counties that aren't pulling their weight (I'm looking at you Leicestershire) to concentrate the better players in fewer teams and bring the overall quality up.

  2. #2
    International Coach morgieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Dishing out broken ****ing floggings
    Posts
    11,417
    Why did they want 2 T20 comps in the first place? Personally think that the pre-existing one should be the rival to the IPL. (Obv not private invested though).
    5-0

    RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012

    Proudly supporting the #2 cricketer of all time.

  3. #3
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    #banblocky
    Posts
    20,368
    The proposal should have been 8 city based franchises based at the Test grounds (Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Cardiff, 2 London teams and Southampton).

    That would have been a real rival to the IPL for 2 reasons:

    1. The English summer is a natural international window - less conflict with boards if players want to participate.

    2. England is safer than the subcontinent.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    The proposal should have been 8 city based franchises based at the Test grounds (Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Cardiff, 2 London teams and Southampton).

    That would have been a real rival to the IPL for 2 reasons:

    1. The English summer is a natural international window - less conflict with boards if players want to participate.

    2. England is safer than the subcontinent.

    Oi **** off omitting Riverside and including the barely Intercontinental Cup standard SWALEC stadium.
    National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th, 11th and 5th in 2009/2011/2013 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion
    Australia’s Darren Lehmann is a ‘blatant loser’ insists Stuart Broad
    Countdown Series 57 Champion
    King of the Arcade
    Reply from mods to my prank bans in public:
    Reply from mods to my prank bans in private:


    MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk


  5. #5
    Cricketer Of The Year four_or_six's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9,189
    Don't know about the alternative, but I'm definitely pleased that there's only going to be one competition.

  6. #6
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    49,113
    City cricket a poor idea IMO
    Quote Originally Posted by DingDong View Post
    gimh has now surpassed richard as the greatest cw member ever imo

    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  7. #7
    State Regular jondavluc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Westside of that big light blub thingy
    Posts
    943
    Thank ****ing goodness.
    Quote Originally Posted by Death
    Dumb I told him"the serpent that never dies is dead I took her life three thousend years ago! the never ending battle has ended"

    Awesome Test XI

    Tillekeratne Dilshan
    Simon Katich
    Ricky Ponting (c)
    Michael Hussey
    Michael Clarke
    AB de Villiers
    Brad Haddin (k)
    Daniel Vettori
    Peter Siddle
    Dong Bollinger
    Ben Hilfenhaus

  8. #8
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Yeah, some of the better schedule alterations to come from the ECB of late. I've hated this 40-over nonsense since it was brought back in 2000-and-whenever-it-was (2005?), the 45-over stuff was just about acceptably comparable to 50-overs. The one good thing to come from the nonsense which was apparently two 20-over comps was that this was to be rid of. Now we've got rid of it without the 20-over overdose.

    Hopefully this might mean the outcome which county cricket has needed for about a century - a bit less on-field cricket, and more time for planning and practising. Ideally we'd have more one-day cricket (be it more 50-overs or the return of 45-over stuff), but the shifting of the 50-over stuff out of May is good, because a wet start to the season essentially meant many players would get 5-6 OD games per season, which is simply not good enough. Ideally, there'd be reserve days for every 50-over game, to cut washouts and reduced-over affairs to an absolute minimum, though that may be asking rather too much.

    I suppose the one disappointing thing is Twenty20 being played all season. It was perfect for both Twenty20 lovers and Twenty20 haters - as well as the players - when it was just a couple of midsummer weeks, with a distinct and clear definition that made it clear that it was totally different from First-Class and one-day cricket. Still, I'll take that as a by-product of this relatively good outcome.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  9. #9
    Hall of Fame Member TT Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    .
    Posts
    16,588
    Great news.

  10. #10
    Hall of Fame Member TT Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    .
    Posts
    16,588
    Quote Originally Posted by GeraintIsMyHero View Post
    City cricket a poor idea IMO
    It is but 18 first class counties is even worse. Too much **** knocking about.

  11. #11
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    49,113
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post

    I suppose the one disappointing thing is Twenty20 being played all season. It was perfect for both Twenty20 lovers and Twenty20 haters - as well as the players - when it was just a couple of midsummer weeks, with a distinct and clear definition that made it clear that it was totally different from First-Class and one-day cricket. Still, I'll take that as a by-product of this relatively good outcome.
    Not sure, I think it's a bad thing to have players playing just one format in a period of a month or so. It doesn't give much scope for Test hopefuls to play FC cricket between series. I think this is actually a good thing and *might* see some internationals fit an extra championship game into the season

  12. #12
    Hall of Fame Member aussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cricket
    Posts
    16,845
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    The proposal should have been 8 city based franchises based at the Test grounds (Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Cardiff, 2 London teams and Southampton).

    That would have been a real rival to the IPL for 2 reasons:

    1. The English summer is a natural international window - less conflict with boards if players want to participate.

    2. England is safer than the subcontinent.
    Nah. No need to rival IPL, which big money investor is gonna invest in cricket in England, like them Indian tycoons??.

    Just keep it simple. Use the simple T20 competition that we have & just create a rule for how much international players a team can have.

  13. #13
    Cricketer Of The Year zaremba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Burgess Hill
    Posts
    8,994
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    The proposal should have been 8 city based franchises based at the Test grounds (Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham, Cardiff, 2 London teams and Southampton).

    That would have been a real rival to the IPL for 2 reasons:

    1. The English summer is a natural international window - less conflict with boards if players want to participate.

    2. England is safer than the subcontinent.
    Don't make me angry, Mr Furball. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
    Last edited by zaremba; 24-07-2009 at 10:56 AM.

  14. #14
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by GeraintIsMyHero View Post
    Not sure, I think it's a bad thing to have players playing just one format in a period of a month or so. It doesn't give much scope for Test hopefuls to play FC cricket between series. I think this is actually a good thing and *might* see some internationals fit an extra championship game into the season
    It was only 2 weeks for the old Twenty20 Cup (which saw its last in 2008) wasn't it?

    If there was ever a break in the international schedule - which there isn't, and hasn't been since 2000 - then internationals could play more domestic cricket. But as long as the winter's tour continues to finish in March or even April, and there is rarely so much as a week where there's no Test or ODI (or Twenty20 International ) cricket, and on the precious rare occasion there is it's an invaluable chance for rest, it will remain the case that Test-and-ODI players play 2-3 games per season at the absolute best.

  15. #15
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    49,113
    Unless I'm mistaken, the T20 Cup has always taken up the bulk of June.

    Obviously players who are involved in the Test & ODI squads will get little chance to play for their counties regardless, but I am thinking of players who maybe aren't in the ODI squad and have a shot at playing Tests. They get to play some FC cricket in June while the ODIs are normally going on and put themselves in the window whereas in recent years the first ODI series has clashed with the T20s

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Future of Cricket, suggestion to the ICC
    By LA ICE-E in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 170
    Last Post: 01-12-2011, 04:16 PM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 25-02-2006, 08:22 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-02-2006, 04:23 AM
  4. Australiand Domestic 20/20 Competition Confirmed
    By Mister Wright in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-02-2005, 06:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •