Why isn't he rated so highly? He played in an era which is supposedly dominated by alltime great bowlers and averaged higher then both Sunil Gavaskar and Sir Vivian Richards, who are both considered alltime greats. He even averaged an almighty 57 after his 100th Test. He also looked like a decent in the footage I've seen. He also has a 200 against every country barring the West Indies & Zimbabwe. So why isn't he rated so highly?