Which is your preferred limited overs format?

[GingerFurball]

Poll to follow.

Would be interested in people's views, I'm going to make the assumption that the vast majority of users of this site prefer Test Cricket, so I'm more interested in what your preferred format is other than Tests.

Personally, I prefer Twenty20. The middle phase of an ODI can be mind numbingly tedious to watch, Twenty20 condenses the action in a way that's much more palatable to the casual viewer.

[Bonnie Prince C]

Test cricket is my favourite form of cricket so I actually do not mind those middle orders. T20 is too short for my liking, I would rather watch some good quality bowling being defended off or some text book cover drives than watching Yuvrak slog Broad for 6 6's in an over.

[pasag]

ODIs involving Aus > T20Is involving Aus > IPL > T20Is between other sides > ODIs between other sides

for me.

[jondavluc]

ODI's.

[Howsie]

ODI's

[Athlai]

450 over cricket, 50 over cricket then 20 over cricket.

[Top_Cat]

These days, T20.

[Mister Wright]

50 over easily.

[Jakester1288]

50 overs. The middle overs can get a tad boring sometimes though.

[Noble One]

50 over’s. Best format for being a spectator, beats Twenty20 as you have the opportunity to watch a full day's cricket, get sunburn and consume copious amounts of beer.

Twenty20 is all over by the time you get back from the bar.

[Zinzan]

Cabbage & meat sauce for mine

[99*]

One Day Internationals.

[Uppercut]

T20 for me, depends on context though.

[Matt79]

ODIs. Less forced and random than T20. More substance.

[Pratters]

T20. As I have said many times, I am a huge fan of the format. It is unpredictable, short, testing, exciting and a crowd puller, all at the same time.