wfdu_ben91
International 12th Man
Sangakkara is good, but not great. What has he exactly done to be labelled great? His innings at Hobart? Surely, if you're going to credit that then you have to give credit to Pietersen for his success against Australia? The only difference was that Sangakkara made runs against Australia's weakest bowling attack (at that time) in the last decade whilst Pietersen made runs against McGrath & Warne. Sangakkara has made the most of batting on placid pitches against Pakistan, pitches that were flat enough to ensure that Thilan Sammaraweera boosted his Test average above 50. He has also scored heavily against Bangladesh. His good though, so I'd say his a 45-47 average batsman.What you don't rate Sangakkarra (IMO the best test bat around right now, except for perhaps sachin) or Yousuf? Jayawardene ain't bad either? I'm not saying pietersen is bad at the short ball, he's bad at the back of a length ball (that delivery was back of a length really) on off stump, especially if it moves a bit. Please note he hasn't really performed against the 'best' opposition 06/07 aside (even that attack wasn't taht good really with warne and macgrath on their last test quality legs), there haven't been to many top class bowlers around for him to face. He's generally struggled against the top bowlers outside england. Steyn this winter and johnson this summer are big tests, if he passes them I shan't have a word against him and shall be filled with praise. My opinon of pietersen is that he cashes in really really well when the conditions and bowling suit him (very entertaining to watch in such conditions), but quite reliably fails when they don't, that jamaica match was a prime example, by the 2nd innings it had become low and skiddy, taylor got one full on off swinging away, kp tried to muscle it through the on side instead of defending and off stump went for a walk. IRC he's never gotten the richy benaud accolade like tendulkar, lara, sangakkarra, dravid or even recently JP Duminy, that's always a pretty good acid test.
Mohammad Yousuf averages in the 20's against the 3 strongest bowling attacks of his generation (Australia, Sri Lanka & South Africa) and averaged over 100 against the 2 weakest bowling attacks of his generation (West Indies & Bangladesh). Pietersen averages over 40 against every Test playing nation. I'd say Mohd Yousuf is around 41-43.
Mahela Jayawardene is a typical subcontient bully, I'd rate him in the same class as Virender Sehwag as far as his success goes. Last time I checked, he averaged 38 outside the subcontient. I'd say his a 40-42.
Warne wasn't past it and nor was McGrath. If McGrath was past it then why did he go onto later win the Player of the Tournament in the 2007 World Cup? Just because he got older doesn't neccessilary mean that he deteriorated. Warne was still as dangerous at any stage of his career and his stats never showed deterioation because the class was always there. Pietersen has conquered the best 3 bowling attacks he has come across thus far, Australia, Sri Lanka and South Africa. That's enough for me to rate him ahead
As far as Richie Benuad goes, that's his opinion. We're all living in the same era, so no one has the correct opinion, not even him. For example, he thinks that Adam Gilchrist is one of the best players that he has ever seen and I always thought Gilly was overrated both as a batsman and as a keeper.