Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Haha, yup.Michael Clarke.
Haha, yup.Michael Clarke.
If the question is "who would never be dropped because the selectors dont have the balls" then the answer is TendySurely the question is meant to be interpreted as who is, and not who should be?
Its not out of the realm of reality that in 18 months time some ridiculous WI selector drops Chanders. Even though he's far more integral to WI than Tendulkar is to India, the reality is Tendulkar is more undroppable one would feel.
Same with Murali, even if his form drops off, if he doesn't want to go, he's not going anywhere.
Agreed. Nobody comes close.Chanderpaul by a street - except for Sarwan bashing an inept England, he's been literally the only thing standing between the WI and massive defeats for years now
If the question is "who would never be dropped because the selectors dont have the balls" then the answer is Tendy
Basically yes. Murali is another.If the question is "who would never be dropped because the selectors dont have the balls" then the answer is Tendy
Given a semi-poor run of form I wouldn't say Kallis would remain in the side for too long. Some good young batting options in South Africa. Would make a big statement from the SA selectors to drop the legend though.Kalis for SA
Not so sure, myself. He'd have to say or do something monolithically stupid, but the ECB showed us during Mooresgate that they aren't afraid to knock KP down a peg or two when they stripped him of the captaincy.After surviving that ridiculous manoevering to get rid of Moores apparently unscathed KP must be as close to untouchable as you can get.
Yeah, this.If the question is "who would never be dropped because the selectors dont have the balls" then the answer is Tendy