• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Superman weeps

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Interesting article on Gilchrist.....

Cricinfo - Superman weeps

Superman weeps

Gilchrist's weighty autobiography reveals that perhaps his greatest success was hiding his insecurities during his playing days

Peter English

March 14, 2009




Sitting in his batting gear before smoking the second-fastest century in Test history, Adam Gilchrist was crying in the WACA dressing room, having decided he was retiring. "It's time. I just know my heart isn't in it anymore."

Unable to cope with his failure in England a year earlier in 2005, he didn't think he was good enough and knew he had been worked out by Andrew Flintoff, who had only to go around the wicket to upset him. Before walking out Gilchrist knew it was time to create a space for the next rung, guys who wanted it more. Fifty-seven balls later he had a century, Australia were on the way to a 5-0 Ashes whitewash, and he decided to stay a bit longer.

Gilchrist is the most successful wicketkeeper-batsman of all time, but perhaps his greatest success was covering up his insecurities, anxieties and sensitivities with the "cape of bravado" he believes all players wear. Even after finishing 608 pages on Gilchrist's life in True Colours, it is bewildering to believe how much he suffered from self-doubt throughout the sort of career a specialist batsman would aspire to, and one that is as impossible to capture for wicketkeepers as a thick leg glance. He was someone who could be looked at on the field to judge his mood, but the Gilchrist scale always seemed to swing from elation to mild annoyance.

Apart from a difficult period during and after England in 2005, he was surely a man who played strokes without fear and lugged around an unshakeable belief. However, he was vulnerable, particularly in a slump, and it was sensible to leave his revelations about his see-sawing feelings until after his career closed last year. He wasn't a superman, but basically normal in every aspect except owning an amazing ability to launch cricket balls and grab catches.

One section is titled "An Emotional Man" and his most stirring passage comes after his dismissal in a Test in South Africa in 2005-06. "I hate this game. No, not the game, I hate this feeling. The fear of failure lies within everyone. But since the Ashes I've continually been overcome by the disappointment of failing, to the point where I don't want to continue. My batting has been so high, and I'm struggling to deal with it being so low. Have I lost it? ... Should I keep playing? Why should I keep playing? For what reasons?"

When comparing his outlook to Shane Warne's he writes: "I'm always worried about what can go wrong, while [Warne] believes in miracles." With each England series Gilchrist feared he would be part of the group that gave the Ashes back - and he was. "I can't be more categorical about it: the 2005 Ashes tour was the worst time of my cricketing life... It was an experience that would leave me with a trauma that took two years to heal."



"I'm always worried about what can go wrong, while Warne believes in miracles"



He skims through how the trip unravelled and in such chaotic circumstances, and for such a heavy book, the chapters end too quickly. There was growing scepticism about the value of the coach, John Buchanan, problems between partners, senior players in severe form slumps, and Gilchrist's own troubles whenever Flintoff came around the wicket.

Admitting to hypersensitivity and paranoia about his wicketkeeping - at first it gave him freedom when batting because his spot was sealed, but when he had made it as an international he fretted about being picked just for his run-making - he also cries a lot. Initially it seemed a good idea to count how often the "famous Gilchrist waterworks" were turned on, but once the tally reached 10 it felt like the hobby of a bully.

There are times, like when he covers the emergence of horrible rumours about the paternity of his sick newborn boy, or the WACA century, or detailing the difficulties of leaving the family, that it's easy to sympathise. He's sensitive, not a sook. Although for a while he was the most charged international cricketer in the game, mostly due to swearing outbursts as he failed to cover his emotions.

Gilchrist is at his best when writing about himself, but his analysis of his team-mates is only slightly more than superficial. This is a book about his life, and despite the surge of news stories when it was released, there is not a brutal judgment in every chapter. It was surprising to see how small his criticism of Sachin Tendulkar was, and the fallout from the SCG Test is a relatively minor section of a typically chronological autobiography.

He didn't debut in Tests until he was 27, an event that takes 217 pages to arrive. It's an epic that requires effort to read and should have been shorter. Lovers of Steve Waugh and Gilchrist are a lot stronger after getting through their dumbbell publications over the past four years. Waugh opened his diary, Gilchrist opened his heart.

Peter English is the Australasia editor of Cricinfo
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
I know I've said it before, but wtf was Gilly thinking naming his book True Colours.
 

Matt79

Global Moderator
He felt that he'd never been able to show who he really was, or what he was really feeling, during his career - hence in his autobiog. he was going to show his true colours.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Does sound a good read. Never really struck me as a player with such an interesting emotional hinterland, probably because of the very definite way he approached his batting. He scores his runs quickly with proper cricketing shots which suggested that self-doubt was an alien concept to him.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Pretty powerful line:

"I'm always worried about what can go wrong, while [Warne] believes in miracles."
 

Matt79

Global Moderator
It is a good read, but it was striking how plagued by doubt he was. To hear him tell it, he was pretty much convinced his entire career that he was somehow a fraud who was going to be exposed - and in 2005 that exactly what he felt had happened. At the peak of his peak, he read a comment by Steve Waugh saying he was one of the very best batsmen of all time, maybe second to Bradman (or similar), and immediately became freaked that he was really only a keeper who could bat a bit, and that he was now doomed to disappoint everyone.

Also striking how much he takes to heart what some of his teammates said and thought. Much is made of the length of this book. He could have written (and in fact did, spliced amongst the other stuff that is in this book) a full length biography regarding his relationship with Warne. They are just very different individuals and Gilly clearly often was at a loss as to how to take Shane.

After reading the book it was very interesting seeing them walking out on the field at the 20/20 match in Melbourne this year with the other commentators chatting away. Given how long it is, Gilchrist can probably be sure Warne won't ever read it, but you'd imagine someone might have given him the gist of just how much angst Gilly had been carrying about about him. Even more amazing in retrospect that Waugh, Warne and Gilchrist all managed to play cricket together for so long without killing each other - probably a testament to successful sportsmen's ability to compartmentalise.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Yeah, it's weird how such an obviously lavishly gifted player was so (apparently and he'd have no cause to lie) stricken with self-doubt.

Warne & SR Waugh seem to embody two popular Australian sporting stereotypes: the pie-and-peas Ocker who just happens to rock up and effortlessly takes/scores a bagful & the gimlet-eyed professional whose game slips into a well-worn grove when he gets to the crease, so honed is it. I'd always sort of thought of Gilly as a bit of both, a professional, yes but one who plays with the apparent ease only the truly blessed can manage, so it's interesting to hear he entertained such doubts seemingly throughout his career.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, had Gilchrist never said it I would have never guessed how insecure he was. Scoring that many runs and at that speed...you'd think it needs all the confidence in the world.
 

Smudge

Hall of Fame Member
You with the big ears
Dont be discouraged
Oh I realize
Its hard to take strike
In a world full of bowlers
You can lose sight of the ball
And the big MCG stands
Can make you feel so small

But I see your true colors
Shining through
I see your true colors
And thats why I love you
So dont be afraid to let them show
Your true colors
True colors are beautiful,
Like a on-drive
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why's that?
Because he played with an angled bat down the ground, high-risk, etc. I distinctly remember thinking the same about Gilly before he played for Aus. Anyone could see he had the raw hitting ability, an amazing eye and he was certainly gritty as several knocks for WA showed but I thought he'd get figured out.

When English pace bowlers started regularly getting through his defence around 1998, I thought his weakness had been found and that would be that. Ironically, it was the ball going away from him that ultimately troubled him more than most and even then, only at the end when his eyes had gone a little. In between those two points, though, he was sensational. Managed to develop a great nick-and-nudge game (using what Benords termed his 'short-arm game') and spanked the daylights out of anything wide/short (his 'long-arm game') whilst maintaining a rock-solid defence and spectacularly up-beat tempo.

I know lots of people said it was because he was coming after a great batting line-up that he had the freedom to go nuts and sometimes, that was true. But so many times, he saved the Aussies with a great counter-attacking knock after the top-order fell in a heap too. His mind was probably his best attacking weapon in the end.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Why's that?
To me he batted like a tail-ender playing that one innings where he makes 50 and constantly looks like he's going to get out. Except he did that EVERY innings.

I'm exaggerating but serious. He just didn't look good. Or safe. Or like he knew what he was doing. But he kept scoring runs.

Just a perception, hate it if you like.
 

Top