Or is it that the conditions have become so hugely skewed in favor of batsmen in tests that a bowling average of 30 in tests is as good as 25 some years back?
I think the broad scenario must be discussed before categorising Steyn as poor.
I mean, he would come on the top 5 fast bowlers of any decade with over 100 wickets since 1950 imho. So I don;t think he is the worst best (lol) fast bowler.
And don't you rate Keith Miller as a quality bowler? He ended with 170 wickets.
Or SF Barnes???
Or Colin Blythe??
Or Jim Laker????
Or O Reilly??
Or Fazal Mahmood?
Last edited by Precambrian; 14-02-2009 at 04:09 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)