off course.. Gavaskar is supposed to explain what exactly happend.. and when he doesn't ...it sends wrong masseges to people..and make people believe that something else is going on..people clearly put him accountable for the lose on that much.. but yet i havn't read anywhere .. or any good reason why he played that slow.. there is a difference.. it is one thing that you can't make runs on some days and it is the other thing that you could try.. but you dont want to... Gavaskar didn't seem like he tried to make runs.. if he did he wouldn't be facing over 170 balls to make 36.. the amount of 4s he hit on that match is a prove of that...now if you r saying he couldn't do it ... then you r saying he isn't the same batsman or as good of batsman.. as idiots like you are making him sound like one...or seem like
i don't give a **** about you or million of indians who think whatever they want about him... i think the opposite of that and i have my reasons.. you can simply be mature and respect that rather than insulting me here... i could insult you back.. but i am keeping it to a limit where we both are able to have a mature adult conversation..
what exactly you call those comment then.. millions of those indians dont admit that sunil is racist.. even if they think he is .. i am from afghanistan and we have afghan heros. who are currpt lair, cheaters and even murderer.. but afghans dont admit that.. because they are their heros and they have done something that serve their interest or they are doing things that are in their interest..but that doesn't make those heros saint or good.. to relate that to here.. just because those millions of indians don't think sunil is racist.. that doesn't mean he isn't racist..
ok let me ask you this.. do you aprove of those monkey chants by the indian crowd? because to me.. it sounds like you do aprove of that...
and lets talk about that... i think symond was better of chanted "Kill Symonds" or "knock his bloody head off" rather than he was called monkey.. the reason for that is when those crowd called symond monkey.. they insulted his whole race.. rather than just him..now what you typed there is less effensive than being called moneky..
as far as symond writing stuff about it.. i am not sure i can't tell the future but if he does write.. i am sure he would write it because of guys like sunil.. guys like sunil started puting stuff out there in the media and .. basically leaving a bad example for the other young players...on any case.. sunil is blamed for this..
just to let you know.. when i brought symonds name i wasn't take his side.. i was just giving you an example..and camparing those two situations..
that might be india's first match but it wasn't sunils first day as a batsman..it clearly looks like he never tried to win the match..
Being conterversail is always bad.. if you consider both sides..it is bad for one side that is why it is conterversial.. you dont know this cuz you r too in love with sunil to realize that..
first of all.. those are the two different cases.. i am going to stand to what i have said before... and that was.. it was wrong of pakistani team walking of the field on oval.. i want to make this clear before you get me wrong.. second both of those decisions were taken by captain... that makes both of those captains.. guilty.. not the entire.. cricket team.. now you can blow this out of proportion and claim that i have accused both india and pakistan team and history of cricket unsporting... i wont give a **** about it.. because i never meant it that way..
when i said those cricketers, i was refering to Sir Viv richards, Imran khan, tony graig, and afew others..i have watched tapes of them bating and bowling.. their recards are amzing and not to forget.. i have read about them.. based on that i consider them my favorite cricketers.. no mater how much conterversial they are..now make whatever **** you want out of it... i don't give a ****..