Well, that's a different issue.I don't think Rogers should be next in line after Jaques but I reckon Jaques after being groomed for the spot deserves his place in the lineup.
Haha, I was actually a bit worried he might appear on the poll.Wherez Warner lol?z
Point I was trying to raise.Well, that's a different issue.
If Jaques was able to stay in the opener's spot for a couple more years without getting injured or dropped, then I'd bring in Hughes. Rogers would be 34 by that stage.
OOps - yes, Shakib. Apologies for misspelling the legend's name.Shakib?
The guy is 32 already. What's the point? I guess it's not fair to him to pass him over, but if Australia don't want another Dad's Army with superstars all retiring at once, there's only Hughes to consider. If they really want to go with someone older, it's obviously gotta be Jaques - he has proven himself at the highest level.How can you look past rogers. He is having a stellar year.
Must be cuz hes a vic now.
For crying out loud, get over it. Explains the selections of Peter Siddle, Andrew McDonald, and Cameron White then. That said at least to an extent Siddle and McDonald justified their selections, White did not.How can you look past rogers. He is having a stellar year.
Must be cuz hes a vic now.
If Jaques weren't fit, I could see the possiblity of them picking Rogers over him because they believe that he'd be more effective from the get-go; being a temporary solution.The guy is 32 already. What's the point? I guess it's not fair to him to pass him over, but if Australia don't want another Dad's Army with superstars all retiring at once, there's only Hughes to consider. If they really want to go with someone older, it's obviously gotta be Jaques - he has proven himself at the highest level.
Ponting, Tendulkar, Lara, Waugh - these guys were playing when they were still kids. Australia shouldn't make the same mistake again.