Would the same logic apply to removing restrictions on ball tampering, wicketkeeping gloves and on the construction of bats?I'm no expert on the things, but I fail to see how something is unfair if all are allowed to do it. I basically just support the use of anything that improves performance. As long, obviously, as it doesn't do long-term damage. And there are many things that improve performance - I've never remotely understood how some are deemed legal and some illegal.
Other sports that embrace drugs or are incredibly dangerous to the human body are non-arguments. We are not followers of those sports, and don't need to take cues from them any more than we need to take cues from, say , Saudi Arabia and ban women from driving cars.