WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
The Australian attack of McGrath, Gillespie, Kasprowicz, Warne made far more notable conquests - in the space of a year - than McGrath, Gillespie, Lee, Warne ever did.i feel this aussie attack can win, and did win, on a variety of surfaces more frequently than marshall, holding, garner and roberts.
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourthcricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
I've heard quite a few people suggest that Croft was very fortunate to get into the "original foursome" (Roberts, Holding, Garner, Croft) ahead of Wayne Daniel.
Jason Gillespie is a bowler I always (until his last six months) had a huge amount of time for. He was desperately unlucky with injuries for the first 4 years of his career, performed with excellence whenever he was available, and when he finally got fit had spells of sustained excellence. But these were punctuated by spells of mediocrity (he went about 10 or 11 Tests in 2001 and 2002 averaging over 40 IIRR).
With Croft, the truth is we just don't know how good he might've been if he'd had a long career. My guess is less-than-outstanding, but it's just that - a guess. Gillespie we know how good he was - very good for the most part. As to who had the best career - Gillespie, no question. As to who'd have been the best all things equal, well... there's no real way of knowing.
I'd have Roberts over Gillespie without much doubt though.
i remember a few quotes going around from australian net sessions in the 90's about how scary dizzy was
any WI attack between '76 and '92 qualifies really, bishop could have been anything
Probably top 5 of all time
Along with Barnes, McGrath, Hadlee, Murali (Warne 6th)
Where to place him exactly is harder.
Marshall the best striker of all time it seems according to this...
These are all at the top of my head. A good try at it but failed pretty badly IMO to make such distinctions.
Last edited by Ikki; 21-12-2008 at 01:03 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)