View Poll Results: who is the better batsman?

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • Marcus Trescothick

    12 40.00%
  • Stephen Fleming

    15 50.00%
  • Val Kilmer

    3 10.00%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Trescothick V Fleming

  1. #1
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,714

    Trescothick V Fleming

    I commented on a "recently retired XI" in the spam thread, this XI had Fleming in, I said I would pick Trescothick instead. Someone disagreed. What does the rest of the forum think?
    Quote Originally Posted by DingDong View Post
    gimh has now surpassed richard as the greatest cw member ever imo

    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  2. #2
    International Vice-Captain andruid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sometimes I'm online, Sometimes I'm offline
    Posts
    4,118
    Fleming was a genius of a captain and I reckon probably had a better technique than Trescothick.
    Quote Originally Posted by fredfertang View Post
    Why don't the boxers have any head protection any more?
    Quote Originally Posted by BoyBrumby View Post
    Burgey submitted a class action suggesting they harden the **** up.

  3. #3
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Strange comparison, for one, as Trescothick's an opener and Fleming was a middle-order batsman.

    Obviously Fleming far better for mine though - my thoughts on Trescothick are well-known, his scorebook record flatters him more than perhaps any other player in history, even Virender Sehwag. A distinctly poor batsman whose propensity to get let-offs both from fielders and Umpires made him look Test-class.

    Fleming on the other hand while he could've made more of his ability, at least in the first half of his career, was a pretty decent Test batsman and obviously not from the top drawer, but certainly a good player.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  4. #4
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,714
    The comparison came about because pasag picked him as an opener in his "Recently Retired XI"


  5. #5
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Gelman picked Fleming as an opener?

    Why?

    Or are we talking about ODIs? As Fleming did open regularly in ODIs (though he'd have done far better for mine if he'd batted three or four)? Because if it's about ODI openers, Trescothick was certainly the better of the two.

  6. #6
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,714
    All it said was, "Recently Retired XI"

    He did play a few Tests as an opener though, unless I completely imagined it!?

  7. #7
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    IIRR he opened in 2 Tests against Australia in 2004/05.

    Terrible decision.

    Anyway I thought the idea of picking mythical XIs (like "recently retired") was to bat people in position and pick a genuine team, else you could just have 11 batsmen or 9 bowlers.

  8. #8
    International Coach tooextracool's Avatar
    Dick Quicks Island Adventure Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    not far away from you
    Posts
    14,308
    Purely as batsmen, they were both decent but not as special as some people would like to make out. Fleming actually was a fairly ordinary batsman, surely anyone whos played 111 tests should have scored more than 8 test centuries.
    Whether or not Fleming was a better player on seaming tracks is irrelevant IMO, Trescothick was temperamentally a better player and was able to score big more often. Fleming should have been better, but the bottom line is that he wasnt.
    Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
    Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
    Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!

  9. #9
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,714
    Agree re Fleming's poor number of centuries. Sure, I'm a believer that stats can't tell you everything - without checking, I seem to remember Fleming closing with 49 50s and 9 100s - to me that sort of stat does tell you something. Whereas Trescothick played less Tests, scored more tons and IMO was a key contributor to England becoming one of the top sides in the world. It is no coincidence that our decline from the #2 spot closely matches his absence from the team.

  10. #10
    State Captain krkode's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,781
    Trescothic strikes me as very Sehwag-like in his style... in that sense, he's good at giving his team an explosive start and setting up the game right from the get-go.

    Fleming strikes me more as a Steve Waugh, not just in the sense that he was captain, but also in the sense that more often than not he has to bat carefully and sensibly to try and stabilize the innings.

    You would want both kinds of batsmen in your team, I imagine. But like has been noticed in this thread, neither was the best at what they did as batsmen. Fleming definitely had his captaincy going for him.
    Last edited by krkode; 15-11-2008 at 02:17 PM.

  11. #11
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,714
    Look, that's possibily a very fair point (Y)

    I don't see that we can't compare different types of batsmen though.

  12. #12
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    All Over
    Posts
    15,118
    I think Fleming was the better player but Trescothick may have accomplished more at the highest level.

    If Trescothick would have played 20-30 more Tests, I think his average would have declined rather than increased but we will never know. Rather than speculate, and based on the fact that good openers are harder to find than good middle order player, I take Tresco.
    Last edited by Goughy; 15-11-2008 at 03:55 PM.
    If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits

    West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma

    Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)

    Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net

  13. #13
    U19 Cricketer S.P. Fleming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sydney, New Zealand
    Posts
    473
    Fleming. He still averaged over 40 and there a not many new zealand batsmen who have done that because of our conditions. Still by those stats he passed 50 58 times in 111 matches which is a good effort. I do belive he did underachieve somewhat and shouldve made more centuries. His captaincy was ingenius. For mine hes in a different league.
    Daniel Vettori is an absolute legend!

  14. #14
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,714
    Goughy, I presume you mean 20-30 more Tests?

  15. #15
    Cricket Web Staff Member Woodster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    5,481
    I think Fleming at his best made the game look so easy. He was elegant and possessed plenty of natural talent, more than what Trescothick did, but never made the most of his talent, while Tres probably did.

    Who has left the biggest hole in their respective national sides ? Could certainly be argued Fleming due to NZ's lack of decent batting options, his experience and qualities were invaluable while he was in the side. But England have certainly lacked the controlled aggression at the top, especially in one-day cricket.

    In terms of aesthetics, Fleming gets the nod, in terms of actually delivering, Trescothick for me.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Should Trescothick be dropped?????
    By Nishant in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 25-05-2007, 07:14 AM
  2. Trescothick out of Ashes
    By Laurrz in forum Ashes 2006/07
    Replies: 149
    Last Post: 19-11-2006, 04:26 AM
  3. So what's up with Trescothick?
    By sqwerty in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 26-02-2006, 02:29 PM
  4. Marcus Trescothick
    By Barney Rubble in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 26-07-2005, 01:41 PM
  5. Trescothick is overated.
    By Eclipse in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 13-09-2003, 04:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •