Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: What Kolpaks...

  1. #1
    International Coach morgieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Dishing out broken ****ing floggings
    Posts
    11,176

    What Kolpaks...

    ...would you sign?
    Personally, Pollock & Lara.
    5-0

    RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012

    Proudly supporting the #2 cricketer of all time.

  2. #2
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Locked up inside my opium den, surrounded by some Chinamen
    Posts
    45,257
    I'd like to think, if I were a county coach/selector, I'd be able to resist the charms of carpetbagging Yarps/West Indians, but yeah if one were to go down that route all-time greats like Polly & BCL would have more obvious appeal than yer Benkensteins or yer Ackermans.

    Failing that, young blokes who could potentially qualify for England (like McLaren at Kent) have to tick more boxes than 30-somethings who're here for the money. Not, I hasten to add, that I blame them at all for that.

    If, however, I were under pressure to get results in the short-term my philosophy might become rather more flexible...
    Cricket Web's 2013/14 Premier League Tipping Champion

    - As featured in The Independent.

    "I don't believe a word of Pietersen's book, but then I don't believe a word anyone else has said either."
    - Simon Barnes renders further comment on KP's autobiography superfluous in a sentence

  3. #3
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    still scratching around in the same old hole
    Posts
    15,178
    Quote Originally Posted by morgieb View Post
    ...would you sign?
    Personally, Pollock & Lara.
    Worst kind of players IMO.

    Expensive players whos talents are massively declined and are not a long term investment.
    If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits

    West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma

    Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)

    Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net

  4. #4
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    If it was indeed just for one season (as it now is)? Yep, would go for short-term fixes like those two.

    Because Kolpaks are around for just 1 more season. After that, they're history. And it looks like the overall rule on overseas-players is being tightened-up still further, which can only be a good thing.

    However all-in-all the counties I admire most are those who have not seeked to bypass the overseas-player rule, have just picked the ECB's "recommendation" of 1, and have focused on developing their ground and players. Nice to see Glamorgan, with the likes of Rees, Harris and hopefully, in time, Tom Maynard and Ben Wright, maybe starting to make some gains from that.

    Incidentally, anyone notice the perhaps rather cunning proposed stipulation in the new overseas-player ruling? "Must have played international cricket in the previous 2 years" or something. Hmm, that sounds to me like an ideal way to stop counties signing ICL overseas-players (given that no ICL player will play international cricket) while making it look like you're doing nothing untoward. Smart move.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006


  5. #5
    World Traveller Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
    Posts
    34,131
    Is there a link out there to the new overseas rules, before it becomes clear as mud to me?
    Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever...

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW

    Quote Originally Posted by Boobidy View Post
    Bradman never had to face quicks like Sharma and Irfan Pathan. He wouldn't of lasted a ball against those 2, not to mention a spinner like Sehwag.

  6. #6
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    23,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Incidentally, anyone notice the perhaps rather cunning proposed stipulation in the new overseas-player ruling? "Must have played international cricket in the previous 2 years" or something. Hmm, that sounds to me like an ideal way to stop counties signing ICL overseas-players (given that no ICL player will play international cricket) while making it look like you're doing nothing untoward. Smart move.
    Because county cricket would have been so much better off over the past several years without the Mushtaqs. There's a real sacrifice in quality involved with a ruling like that, and I don't believe it's good for English cricket at all.

  7. #7
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    23,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
    Worst kind of players IMO.

    Expensive players whos talents are massively declined and are not a long term investment.
    DWTA, they're the players most likely to aid the development of the English players around them. Which is indeed the major goal of the county circuit, is it not?

  8. #8
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    still scratching around in the same old hole
    Posts
    15,178
    Quote Originally Posted by Uppercut View Post
    DWTA, they're the players most likely to aid the development of the English players around them. Which is indeed the major goal of the county circuit, is it not?
    In answer to the question, IMO, no.

    Moving on, I dont think having big names that are declining has ever been a good idea. They get paid over what they produce, young local players get into a comfort zone and dont produce and there is no evidence on helpign young players (some like Warne might but they are few and far between) etc.

    I think it is a recipe for disaster.

    There are 2 areas Id look.

    - Id be looking for a quality specialist (regardless of age) to provide a skill difficult to obtain. ie quality spinner
    - A quality 2nd or 3rd string International player that can dedicate their career to the County and develop a relationship with the clb and the supporters. eg Benkenstein

    Dropping in fading big names looks desperate from the clubs POV and mercinary from the players. It benefits noone.

  9. #9
    Cricketer Of The Year zaremba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Burgess Hill
    Posts
    8,991
    Quote Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
    In answer to the question, IMO, no.

    Moving on, I dont think having big names that are declining has ever been a good idea. They get paid over what they produce, young local players get into a comfort zone and dont produce and there is no evidence on helpign young players (some like Warne might but they are few and far between) etc.

    I think it is a recipe for disaster.

    There are 2 areas Id look.

    - Id be looking for a quality specialist (regardless of age) to provide a skill difficult to obtain. ie quality spinner
    - A quality 2nd or 3rd string International player that can dedicate their career to the County and develop a relationship with the clb and the supporters. eg Benkenstein

    Dropping in fading big names looks desperate from the clubs POV and mercinary from the players. It benefits noone.
    Your point about developing a long-term relationship with club and fans is a good one. Benk is a great example. Down at Sussex, Murray Goodwin is similar. He's been with us for years and has had a massive and entirely positive impact on the club and on the players around him.

  10. #10
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Uppercut View Post
    Because county cricket would have been so much better off over the past several years without the Mushtaqs. There's a real sacrifice in quality involved with a ruling like that, and I don't believe it's good for English cricket at all.
    Yep, there is something of a sacrifice in quality. But clearly, whatever you think of it, finding a way to stop ICL players playing in county cricket that doesn't arise any suspcions of the lawyers is among the ECB's top priorities. And this is a very smart move in that direction.

    As for Saqlain, he's now British nationalised via residence and will not be affected by it. As for the sacrifice in quality involved - TBH, we wait to see. Though the likes of Adam Voges, Chris Rogers, Michael di Venuto etc. are unquestionably quality players, I question whether they're of such high quality to justify the increase in expenditure.

    Remember, there'll always be British-passport-of-convenience players and EU-passport players. No-one can stop counties wasting money on them so the more that can be stopped from being wasted on official overseas-players, the better.

  11. #11
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    still scratching around in the same old hole
    Posts
    15,178
    Quote Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
    Your point about developing a long-term relationship with club and fans is a good one. Benk is a great example. Down at Sussex, Murray Goodwin is similar. He's been with us for years and has had a massive and entirely positive impact on the club and on the players around him.
    Goodwin is a good example. The type you want are people that will be good servants of the club.

  12. #12
    Cricket Web Owner James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    23,951
    Throwing a Kiwi name into the mix, Craig Spearman.

  13. #13
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Spearman isn't actually a Kolpak - he's been playing over here since well before the ruling. IIRR it was 2001 that he first signed. He may be a Kiwi by birth, upbringing and residence, but he has a Welsh grandma so qualifies as British.

    I don't think NZ has the requistite trade agreement with the EU to make Kolpak Kiwis possible. Andre Adams, for instance, only qualifies because he has Guyanese (or somewhere Caribbean) parents.

    Though I've often wondered how Paul Wiseman gets to play without anyone being allowed to class him as an overseas-player.

    Hamish Marshall, the other Kiwi, has IIRR an Irish parent.

  14. #14
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    23,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
    In answer to the question, IMO, no.

    Moving on, I dont think having big names that are declining has ever been a good idea. They get paid over what they produce, young local players get into a comfort zone and dont produce and there is no evidence on helpign young players (some like Warne might but they are few and far between) etc.

    I think it is a recipe for disaster.

    There are 2 areas Id look.

    - Id be looking for a quality specialist (regardless of age) to provide a skill difficult to obtain. ie quality spinner
    - A quality 2nd or 3rd string International player that can dedicate their career to the County and develop a relationship with the clb and the supporters. eg Benkenstein

    Dropping in fading big names looks desperate from the clubs POV and mercinary from the players. It benefits noone.
    I'm sure i've read somewhere that county cricket runs at a loss, financed by the ECB as an investment in the quality of the national side. In any case, it's difficult to argue the importance of counties over that of a nation considering that should a player ever become just a little too good, the county lose him for most of the summer. Although i'd be inclined to favour county cricket in much the way you do, if i'm honest.

    It's hard to believe young players could possibly fail to learn anything from the likes of Shaun Pollock. For me, the worst Kolpaks are washed-up internationals who were never that good anyway, Corey Collymore for example.

  15. #15
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Corey Collymore is far from "not any good at all". Collymore is a very fine bowler, one who is and always has been only a little short of Test-class. And if he's a good teacher (how good a player is is a completely irrelevant question when considering how good they are at passing-on their skills) he'll be very useful. Nonetheless, as an employed player you're a player first and a coach second.

    As to the question of county cricket in general - yes the primary function of counties is indeed to produce players for England. All counties depend completely on the ECB for most of their income and if they can't produce cricketers that people want to watch play for England they'll wither and die. However, yes, county cricket is a competition in itself, and there's no reason the aims of a county and England can't run concurrantly.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is It Aussie Kolpaks now
    By brockley in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-09-2007, 08:12 PM
  2. Kolpaks is it killing south african cricket
    By brockley in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-06-2007, 04:15 PM
  3. How is kolpaks effecting south african cricket?
    By brockley in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 31-08-2006, 08:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •