Precambrian
Banned
The great Worcestershire batsman bids adieu from the county scene at the end of this season. Farewell man, a great unfulfilled international talent.
Agree with every word of the post above, but he has had a great career in terms of his Odi and county efforts, so he surely leaves a legacy behind him, for other English players to look upto.Well, unfulfilled Test talent more like. Hick is and remains one of England's best ODI batsmen in the modern ODI era. Second only to Knight for mine.
Anyway as I said in the domestic season thread, I doubt we'll see many if anyone else after him who serves one county so phenomenally. The words Hick and Worcestershire have been synonomous since before I was born, never mind since I started watching the game. It'll feel a bit weird without him on their teamsheets, but no-one can go on forever. He's 42 - most people could only dream of averaging in the mid-40s in the county game at that age. What a fine way for an exceptional batsman to finish. Just hope he can play in the last couple of games of the season.
Care to elaborate slightly? I'm not exactly sure what you meanOf his era, only Lara is remotely comparable.
If I was the captain of a CC team and, during the late 80s, 90s and 2000s, I could have chosen 1 player for the team, it would have been Hick. Lara would have been 2nd pick.Care to elaborate slightly? I'm not exactly sure what you mean
He averaged 47 in the only season he played in county cricket. Decent, but not as high as one would've imagined a boy (he was 19 then) would've scored.Don't think Goughy rates him in CC as he averaged something mediocre like 43 with many unfulfilled innings.
Lets not turn this around to Tendulkar. Its supposed to be about Hick.Don't think Goughy rates him in CC as he averaged something mediocre like 43 with many unfulfilled innings.
But no argument on the fact that Hick was class. His batting stance, similar to that of Kambli, where he would hang the bat parallel to the ground (instead of repeatedly hitting the ground) during the bowler's delivery stride, is an early imprint in my memory of an English batsman.He averaged 47 in the only season he played in county cricket. Decent, but not as high as one would've imagined a boy of his calibre (he was 19 then) would've scored.
Ironically the same guy averages over 60 in Test cricket in England, against arguably the best from the CCs.
Strange yardstick.
What shouldn't be forgotten is that Hick was far from a complete failure at Test level - between 1992/93 and the early part of 1995/96 he averaged in the mid-40s, as good as almost anyone around, against bowling-attacks that featured little let-up.I well remember the lead up to Hick's test debut aginst the West Indies - he was seen by the press and supporters alike as the one man complete answer to their domination of England (and everyone else) and it was just assumed his performances would be outstanding (he had made his 1,000 in May in 1988 culminating in a big ton from a Windies attack including Ambrose, Patterson, Bishop and Walsh) - of course what happened was that the 1991 Windies, Ambrose in particular if I recall correctly, targetted him relentlessly and he failed. He didn't and doesn't have the personality of a KP and I don't think as a result of his baptism of fire he ever had the confidence at Test level which he had at County level - had he had that confidence he'd have been fine is my view - I dont subscribe to the oft quoted view that he had a flawed technique - he was a terrific batsman who deserves to be remembered for that as well as for his comparative failure at the highest level