Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-06-2003, 03:03 PM   #31 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
 
Neil Pickup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
I think I was about right about scoring

Quote:
I reckon 180 ought to win games, that 140-150's par, and we'll see a couple of 200+.
Maybe even an under-estimate
__________________
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog
Neil Pickup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2003, 03:32 PM   #32 (permalink)
Soutie
 
Langeveldt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stellenbosch - South Africa
Posts: 29,336
Quote:
Originally posted by Neil Pickup
I think I was about right about scoring



Maybe even an under-estimate

Very heavily weighted depending on which ground... For Example a number of sweeps went for six in Taunton which is tiny which probably would have been caught elsewhere..

I think the scores will be restricted once the opposition learn that two class bowlers can really dry the runs up... For Example Waqar Younis was impossible to get away tonight, especially as it was very dark towards the end...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
Don't like using my iPod dock. Ruins battery life too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
Thanks Dick Smith. Will remember to subscribe to your newsletter for more electronic fun facts.

****.
Langeveldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2003, 04:04 PM   #33 (permalink)
Cricket Web Vice Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally posted by Langeveldt
Very heavily weighted depending on which ground... For Example a number of sweeps went for six in Taunton which is tiny which probably would have been caught elsewhere..

I think the scores will be restricted once the opposition learn that two class bowlers can really dry the runs up... For Example Waqar Younis was impossible to get away tonight, especially as it was very dark towards the end...
I totally agree, there are so many factors that could sway one of these games.

As you say ground size, today at The Rose Bowl and in the Surrey match a combined total of 4 6's were hit, yet in the Somerset game there were loads.

Again like you say the weather could prove a big factor for a team batting 2nd in the setting sun and fading light etc. However the light was fantastic in sunny Hampshire and play could have easy have gone on for at least another 30 mins.

I think like you say about Waqar being hard to get away, I think there will always be at least one or two bowlers who keep things rather tight, in the Hampshire game 4 bowlers (both inngs) who conceded less runs than balls bowled, yet a total of 150+ was still achieved... and like I say that was without having to hit loads of 6's - in fact just under half of the final total of both sides (301 runs) only 146 runs come in boundaries, which shows hard running and finding the gaps still are a massive part of the game, it's not trying to hit the ball out the ground on every shot like alot of people thought it would be.

Last edited by Rich2001; 13-06-2003 at 04:09 PM.
Rich2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2003, 04:52 PM   #34 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Mr Mxyzptlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad)
Posts: 36,795
Ahh, condensed cricket...
__________________
Sreesanth said, "Next ball he was beaten and I said, 'is this the King Charles Lara? Who is this impostor, moving around nervously? I should have kept my mouth shut for the next ball - mind you, it was a length ball - Lara just pulled it over the church beyond the boundary! He is a true legend."

Mr Mxyzptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2003, 04:58 PM   #35 (permalink)
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Rik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shropshire, England
Posts: 8,353
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
Ahh, condensed cricket...
And like the milk it will probably end up with a nasty taste in the mouth...
__________________
"Age is just a stupid number"

20...that's a rather big number :(:(:(
Rik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2003, 04:59 PM   #36 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
Ahh, condensed cricket...
Dead right. The early blast with the fielding restrictions blends nicely in to the frantic flaying at the end.


My first impression was that it was hectic fun (and the players seemed to be enjoying themselves too - a bit).

Bouncy Castles and cricket - what more do you want?
__________________
Nigel Clough's Black and White Army, beating Forest away with 10 men
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2003, 04:59 PM   #37 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Mr Mxyzptlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad)
Posts: 36,795
How elegantly stated.
Mr Mxyzptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 04:35 AM   #38 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,341
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich2001
In other games though I notice Warwicks are using I Bell to open the bowling, why?
I think the idea was take the pace off the ball? I notice Burns opened for Somerset.
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 04:54 AM   #39 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
I should like to congratulate Worcestershire on a performance of glorious ineptitude today - 122 all out.

Hurriedly checks Derbyshire's score, sees that Yorkshire have made 186, shuts mouth quickly
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 05:19 AM   #40 (permalink)
Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Rik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shropshire, England
Posts: 8,353
Twenty20 looks a decent idea...just too short. You can't value your wicket and players are often out quickly because they have to score straight off. Also a run a ball often isn't good enough! I'm watching Worcestershire vs Gloustershire and the number of poor shots being played because of the pressure of scoring reminds me of watching bowling pins just as the bowler releases the bowling ball. They really don't have much of a chance...
Rik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 06:08 AM   #41 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by Rik
Twenty20 looks a decent idea...just too short. You can't value your wicket and players are often out quickly because they have to score straight off. Also a run a ball often isn't good enough! I'm watching Worcestershire vs Gloustershire and the number of poor shots being played because of the pressure of scoring reminds me of watching bowling pins just as the bowler releases the bowling ball. They really don't have much of a chance...
Give it time. The most important aspect at present is the fact that the games are being played in front of huge crowds - 3 or 4 times as many as B&H group games. Now that's not going to leave a nasty taste in anyone's mouth.

Face it, the biggest problem from an England perspective in ODI's has always been the last 20 overs. What better way of practicing that than to have games where you JUST have the last 20 overs?

Me, I just can't wait for Thursday when I'm going to watch Derbyshire against Notts. Bouncy castle here I come!
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 10:16 AM   #42 (permalink)
PY
International Coach
 
PY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 10,736
Quote:
Originally posted by Rik
the number of poor shots being played because of the pressure of scoring reminds me of watching bowling pins just as the bowler releases the bowling ball.
I think that's what makes this competition good, with time people will improve under this pressure (though not the people who count i.e. the England ODI side) and being able to cope with pressure will stand them in good stead for all other forms of the game as all involve pressure.

Can't for the life of me explain why it's been done so none of the international side gets to play in this. Just hope the potential younger players get used to pressure and bring that through in future.
__________________
A True Champion - Bob. Rest in peace. 15/04/06
"People today have too big a devil and too small a God"

- Stephen Currie

"The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?" Psalm 27:1
PY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 11:18 AM   #43 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,341
From what I've heard it has been a great success, with lots of people going - I guess the weather has helped!
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 11:46 AM   #44 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Just looking to see whether Essex are going to be penalised over bowling rate - I reckon their time's up with an over and 2 balls to go (Azhar's peppering the car park, so maybe there'll be an allowance for that)
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2003, 09:41 PM   #45 (permalink)
World Traveller
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
Posts: 34,131
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich2001
To be fair the above could happen, but theres two things you need to remember here

1/ It's not a new Comp, it's replacing the B&H Cup so players would be playing anyway therfore could have got injuries.

2/ With the need to score quickly and consistantly, therefore the English players will qain much needed pratcie in uping the scoring rate which they struggle in the ODI and it was said England had one of the worse 4/6's % in the game, so this will help. But probley the major point is that the guys will lean new shots / deliveries (in effort to score / prevent runs) which can only be a good thing if they take them onto International level.
I never supported the B & H Cup. I could not imagine a competition supported by a ciggerette company that promotes cardiovascular disease and yet is supporting a cricket which is always trying to get people into the sport???
__________________
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever...

RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boobidy View Post
Bradman never had to face quicks like Sharma and Irfan Pathan. He wouldn't of lasted a ball against those 2, not to mention a spinner like Sehwag.
Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web