Abdul could've done better too, though.A poor man's Abdul Qadir at best.
I think there was a time when he was certainly considering it. Saqlain and Azhar Mahmood are both now England-qualified (though unlikely to play, for obvious reasons - neither are that good, Azhar never was).I doubt he would've ever wanted to play for England so I hardly think England missed out on his services in their national side.
In 97-98 he was better then your Mark Ealham's ,Ian Austin's and all the other piss poor all-rounders you guys tried out.I think there was a time when he was certainly considering it. Saqlain and Azhar Mahmood are both now England-qualified (though unlikely to play, for obvious reasons - neither are that good, Azhar never was).
Qadir was an enigma many a times his off-field antics took his focus away from the game and he suffered from form slumps, talent wise he was miles ahead of mush.Abdul could've done better too, though.
That may be but your description of Mushy as "a poor man's Qadir at best" is pretty misleading. He didn't even play for Pakistan in what were (as he says himself) his best years. His impact in England has been phenomenal.Qadir was an enigma many a times his off-field antics took his focus away from the game and he suffered from form slumps, talent wise he was miles ahead of mush.
Didn't Jesse Ryder "consider" the same thing? Obviously it was never going to happen (and so it proved to be) and I'd imagine Mushtaq Ahmed would be a similar enough case.I think there was a time when he was certainly considering it. Saqlain and Azhar Mahmood are both now England-qualified (though unlikely to play, for obvious reasons - neither are that good, Azhar never was).
To be fair, we haven't heard of any further incidents surrounding Ryder since the night out that resulted in him injuring his hand in early March. Effectively that caused him to miss the tour of England, a highlight of any player's career for sure, so hopefully that'll make him think a little harder about his decisions off the field from now on - wouldn't exactly bet on it though.Does Ryder actually think about anything? Or does he just act impulsively? Evidence to date suggests the latter, and his "move" to Ireland strikes me as one such example.
He turned 24 earlier in the month so a pretty good guess there.He's 23 (or is it 24?) now - I usually give-up hope on people by that age. If he was going to change you'd think it'd have happened by now.
You always continue to hope though, and sometimes people are, well, late learners.
Disagree very strongly with the above comment.He's 23 (or is it 24?) now - I usually give-up hope on people by that age. If he was going to change you'd think it'd have happened by now..
Ricky Ponting.Disagree very strongly with the above comment.
See Cowan, Jimmy.
Haha, dire.He's 23 (or is it 24?) now - I usually give-up hope on people by that age. If he was going to change you'd think it'd have happened by now.
I've got plenty, just ftr, and 'writing people off' at 23/24 is absolute lunacy, as well as completely ignorant and uninformed.Nah. Dunno how much experience you have of self-destructive types?