Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-07-2008, 07:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,645
The Linear Test World Champions

I was having a bit of a Google (as one does) & I stumbled across this site:

Test cricket world champions since 1876

We're indebted to a gentleman called John Birch who, taking the first ever test as his start, has proposed a theoretical test world championship belt similar to the ones in boxing, whereby you become world champions simply by beating the existing champions. A lot less complex a method than the ICC test rankings, certainly.

Amazingly, Zimbabwe were once the linear world champs by virtue of their win over India (the Indians having claimed the title by beating Oz in their 97/98 home series), but NZ have never held the title & SA haven't for over 100 years.

The site was last updated in 2001, when India again became champions with a home win over Australia, so I've taken the liberty of updating the title holders:

2001: India: drew 1-1 with Zimbabwe in Zimbabwe (2 tests)
2001: Sri Lanka: beat India 2-1 in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat Bangladesh 1-0 in Sri Lanka (1 test)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat West Indies 3-0 win in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat Zimbabwe 3-0 in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat Pakistan 1-0 in Pakistan (1 test)
2002: England: beat Sri Lanka 2-0 in England (3 tests)
2002: England: drew 1-1 with India in England (4 tests)
2002/03: Australia: beat England 4-1 in Australia (5 tests)
2002/03: Australia: beat West Indies 3-1 in West Indies (4 tests)
2003: Australia: beat Bangladesh 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2003/04: Australia: beat Zimbabwe 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2003/04: Australia: drew 1-1 with India in Australia (4 tests)
2003/04: Australia: beat Sri Lanka 3-0 in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2004: Australia: beat Sri Lanka 1-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat India 2-1 in India (4 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat New Zealand 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat Pakistan 3-0 in Australia (3 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat New Zealand 2-0 in New Zealand (3 tests)
2005: England: beat Australia 2-1 in England (5 tests)
2005/06: Pakistan: beat England 2-0 in Pakistan (3 tests)
2005/06: Pakistan: beat India 1-0 in Pakistan (3 tests)
2005/06: Pakistan: beat Sri Lanka 1-0 in Sri Lanka (2 tests)
2006: England: beat Pakistan 2-0 in England (4 tests)
2006/07: Australia: beat England 5-0 in Australia (5 tests)
2007/08: Australia: beat Sri Lanka 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2007/08: Australia: beat India 2-1 in Australia (4 tests)
2008: Australia: beat West Indies 2-0 in West Indies (3 tests)

Heartening to see we've 3 times held the title this decade, having not previously been champions since 79/80.

Only a bit of fun, obv. But hopefully diverting for a few minutes at least.
__________________
- As featured in The Independent.

"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
BoyBrumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2008, 07:44 AM   #2 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Goughy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: All Over
Posts: 14,652
Interesting. Was thinking about this no more than a day ago

Good to see
__________________
If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits

West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma

Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)

Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net
Goughy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2008, 07:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Perm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clutha Valley, New Zealand
Posts: 21,817
14 year run by the West Indies looks alright.
__________________
The Future of International Cricket - Rohit Sharma, Suresh Raina, Ravi Bopara, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Shahriar Nafees, Raqibul Hasan, Salman Butt, JP Duminy
Proud Supporter of the Bangladeshi Tigers
Ryan ten Doeschate - A Legend in the Making
MSN: zacattack90@hotmail.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Romance can be dealt with elsewhere - I just don't enjoy it in cricket.
Perm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2008, 07:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
steds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riding public transport back and forth
Posts: 16,914
Tried something like this a couple of months back after reading someone (Goughy?) say something about considering a side world champions after they beat the incumbents away from home. Not entirely sure about the accuracy, but came out with this:
Code:
From	Until	Team
1877	1882/83	Australia
1882/83	1899	England
1899	1903/04 Australia
1903/04	1909 	England
1909	1911/12 Australia
1911/12	1921 	England
1921	1932/33	Australia
1932/33	1934	England
1934	1954/55	Australia
1954/55	1961	England
1961	1970/71	Australia
1970/71	1971	England
1971	1974/75	India
1974/75	1994/95	West Indies
1994/95	current	Australia
steds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2008, 07:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by steds View Post
Tried something like this a couple of months back after reading someone (Goughy?) say something about considering a side world champions after they beat the incumbents away from home.
'Twas Whelan.
__________________
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
Quote:
chris.hinton: h
FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 12:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
Eternal Optimist
 
GIMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shake my tree where's the apple for me?
Posts: 43,622
Just saw this now. Interesting stuff. Will be interesting to dig up now and again, if Australia lose a series anytime soon.
__________________
Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they’ll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces

RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
GIMH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 03:46 AM   #7 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
_Ed_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, Aotearoa
Posts: 19,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoyBrumby View Post
Amazingly, Zimbabwe were once the linear world champs by virtue of their win over India (the Indians having claimed the title by beating Oz in their 97/98 home series), but NZ have never held the title


Interesting stuff though.
_Ed_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2010, 01:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,645
India world champions!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoyBrumby View Post
I was having a bit of a Google (as one does) & I stumbled across this site:

Test cricket world champions since 1876

We're indebted to a gentleman called John Birch who, taking the first ever test as his start, has proposed a theoretical test world championship belt similar to the ones in boxing, whereby you become world champions simply by beating the existing champions. A lot less complex a method than the ICC test rankings, certainly.

Amazingly, Zimbabwe were once the linear world champs by virtue of their win over India (the Indians having claimed the title by beating Oz in their 97/98 home series), but NZ have never held the title & SA haven't for over 100 years.

The site was last updated in 2001, when India again became champions with a home win over Australia, so I've taken the liberty of updating the title holders:

2001: India: drew 1-1 with Zimbabwe in Zimbabwe (2 tests)
2001: Sri Lanka: beat India 2-1 in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat Bangladesh 1-0 in Sri Lanka (1 test)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat West Indies 3-0 win in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat Zimbabwe 3-0 in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2001/02: Sri Lanka: beat Pakistan 1-0 in Pakistan (1 test)
2002: England: beat Sri Lanka 2-0 in England (3 tests)
2002: England: drew 1-1 with India in England (4 tests)
2002/03: Australia: beat England 4-1 in Australia (5 tests)
2002/03: Australia: beat West Indies 3-1 in West Indies (4 tests)
2003: Australia: beat Bangladesh 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2003/04: Australia: beat Zimbabwe 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2003/04: Australia: drew 1-1 with India in Australia (4 tests)
2003/04: Australia: beat Sri Lanka 3-0 in Sri Lanka (3 tests)
2004: Australia: beat Sri Lanka 1-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat India 2-1 in India (4 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat New Zealand 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat Pakistan 3-0 in Australia (3 tests)
2004/05: Australia: beat New Zealand 2-0 in New Zealand (3 tests)
2005: England: beat Australia 2-1 in England (5 tests)
2005/06: Pakistan: beat England 2-0 in Pakistan (3 tests)
2005/06: Pakistan: beat India 1-0 in Pakistan (3 tests)
2005/06: Pakistan: beat Sri Lanka 1-0 in Sri Lanka (2 tests)
2006: England: beat Pakistan 3-0 in England (4 tests)
2006/07: Australia: beat England 5-0 in Australia (5 tests)
2007/08: Australia: beat Sri Lanka 2-0 in Australia (2 tests)
2007/08: Australia: beat India 2-1 in Australia (4 tests)
2008: Australia: beat West Indies 2-0 in West Indies (3 tests)
Thought I'd update this:

2008/09: India beat Australia 2-0 in India (4 tests)
2008/09: India beat England 1-0 in India (2 tests)
2008/09: India beat New Zealand 1-0 in New Zealand (3 tests)
2009/10: India beat Sri Lanka 2-0 in India (3 tests)
2009/10: India beat Bangladesh 2-0 in Bangladesh (2 tests)

As we can see, India are not only the no.1 test side in the ICC rankings, but also the current linear world champs having wrested the crown from Oz by winning the Border/Gavaskar series in 2008 and successfully defending their crown 4 times since.
BoyBrumby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2010, 02:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Goughy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: All Over
Posts: 14,652
Just done somethng similar using the idea that you have to beat the Champ in their home to take the title (ie have to knock out the Champ to take the belt)

So using 3 match series min and have to win away.

Linear World Champs

Start - 1899- Eng
1899 1903/04- Aus
03/04 - 09- Eng
09 - 11/12- Aus
11/12 - 21- Eng
21 - 28/29- Aus
28/29 - 30- Eng
30 - 32/33- Aus
32/33 - 34- Eng
34 - 54/55- Aus
55 - 61- Eng
61 - 70/71- Aus
70/71 - 71 Eng
71 - 74/75- India
74/75 - 94/95- WI
94/95 - 08- Aus
08/09 - 08/09- SA
08/09 - Pres- Aus

Gah, Aus still on top. SA with the shortest reign in Test history.
Goughy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2010, 03:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Pratters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kolkata, India
Posts: 20,794
Yeah I like to take it as that as well Goughy. Any changes if it was reduced to less than 3 tests?
Pratters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2010, 04:44 PM   #11 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Somerset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 9,863
Both interesting and somewhat depressing to hear that New Zealand have never been the holders of the "world test champion title" on such a list, yet even Zimbabwe have managed it. For the record I do prefer Goughy's list and criteria that to take the title, a side must win away from home in Ranfurly Shield style.
Somerset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2010, 04:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Goughy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: All Over
Posts: 14,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
Just done somethng similar using the idea that you have to beat the Champ in their home to take the title (ie have to knock out the Champ to take the belt)

So using 3 match series min and have to win away.

Linear World Champs

Start - 1899- Eng
1899 1903/04- Aus
03/04 - 09- Eng
09 - 11/12- Aus
11/12 - 21- Eng
21 - 28/29- Aus
28/29 - 30- Eng
30 - 32/33- Aus
32/33 - 34- Eng
34 - 54/55- Aus
55 - 61- Eng
61 - 70/71- Aus
70/71 - 71 Eng
71 - 74/75- India
74/75 - 94/95- WI
94/95 - 08- Aus
08/09 - 08/09- SA
08/09 - Pres- Aus

Gah, Aus still on top. SA with the shortest reign in Test history.

Haha, ****. Just realised that Steds did this exact same thing earlier in the thread.
Goughy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2010, 06:08 PM   #13 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Jungle Jumbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,898
The international football unofficial world championships is a lot more interesting, partly because if there are a few unusual results it can get dragged around a few backwaters before reemerging.
Jungle Jumbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-01-2010, 02:44 AM   #14 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
wpdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
Haha, ****. Just realised that Steds did this exact same thing earlier in the thread.
At least you've ensured that England no onger have the shortest reign

Not sure about all of this, tbh. Granted anything to streamline the current situation is worth discussing, but the above just seem too open to rogue results. I've not seen a lot to change my view that the test championship is either pointless because it's blatantly obvious who the best side is or meaningless because the top sides are too close to call.
wpdavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-01-2010, 05:19 AM   #15 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,533
It's not meaningless if that's the case because it gives teams something to aim for. If a 3-0 result means a team jumps up in the rankings instead of 2-0, then it may make that team go out in a dead rubber and try and win the match a bit more than they might have if it were simply a dead rubber with no consequences.
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Cups and Champions Trophies Neil Pickup Cricket Web XI 26 12-04-2007 05:23 PM
World Cup for Tests? discussions...World Test Series? LA ICE-E Cricket Chat 19 22-11-2006 02:41 PM
Reward For Test Champions chalky Cricket Chat 10 15-10-2005 12:06 PM
We Are Officially The World Champions!!! Blewy General Sports Forum 16 29-01-2004 12:49 AM
The Future Champions of Test Cricket Shawn Badyk Cricket Chat 32 10-07-2003 03:11 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web