What did other people think of Channel 4's highlights?? For those that work, it is the chance to catch up on events in that precious 30 minute slot. However, once you get past Mark Nicholas's maddening commentary and window dressing from the cameras, there was actually only about 15 mins or less of cricket (also a break halfway through)
I think Channel 4 do a good job covering the cricket but I would say they should concentrate on the crickert and not too much on the aesthetics of it all.
What do people think of Channel 4's coverage?? Complaints/Praise??
I thought Tresco batted well and his ability to leave the ball with decent judgement stood him in good stead. A decent 50 in seamer-friendly conditions is a start I'm sure he'll be happy with.
John
I think Channel 4 do a good job covering the cricket but I would say they should concentrate on the crickert and not too much on the aesthetics of it all.
What do people think of Channel 4's coverage?? Complaints/Praise??
I thought Tresco batted well and his ability to leave the ball with decent judgement stood him in good stead. A decent 50 in seamer-friendly conditions is a start I'm sure he'll be happy with.
John