Ah, confidence and self-belief. None any use if you're not class players. Boon already was, Border had been for years, and Stephen Waugh would become such a thing 6 years later.The guys who actually played in that final have spoken many times about how winning the 1987 WC gave them much confidence and self-belief which transferred to their Test form. You won't need to look far to see Steve Waugh, Bobby Simpson, David Boon, AB and others quoted as saying exactly that. Considering the same players who led the WC win led the revival in Aussie fortunes, you can't credibly argue a disconnect between the two.
That was indeed very crucialTendulkar Caught by Akram Bowled Saqlain in chennai
You can't seriously beleive that?Ah, confidence and self-belief. None any use if you're not class players.
Hahaha, what? Sigworthy for mine.Ah, confidence and self-belief. None any use if you're not class players.
you are a funny man, richard.Ah, confidence and self-belief. None any use if you're not class players.
Terrible decision, that ball was doing far too much.
I Meckiff run out 2
Maybe would've been Stephen Waugh c Browne b K Benjamin 42, Sabina Park, 1995.
As it was, though, the catch was dropped.
The way I've heard it, that was rather like Kasprowicz circa '05 in that the wicket should actually have fallen earlier.CJ McDermott c Murray b Walsh 18
Adelaide, 26 January 1993.
West Indies win by one run. First ever test victory by a one run margin.
Nah, class is class. Can't be manufactured.You can't seriously beleive that?
Even players who are middle of the road in terms of class can up their performances with confidence and self-beleif, heck those two things can often lift people up a notch to become 'class players'.
CJ McDermott c Murray b Walsh 18
Adelaide, 26 January 1993.
West Indies win by one run. First ever test victory by a one run margin.
Actually, thinking about this, I really, really wish these had indeed been (respectively) non-dismissal and dismissal.Maybe would've been Stephen Waugh c Browne b K Benjamin 42, Sabina Park, 1995.
As it was, though, the catch was dropped.
who told you david boon was the boonie that we know from day one? he could have very easily been the next dirk welham! not just him even bruce reid and craig mcdermott would have gone the dave gilbert simon davis way quite easily.Nah, class is class. Can't be manufactured.
Obviously class without confidence is little use either, but confidence (as the 1987 WC and countless millions of other examples prove) can be created. Heck, a good sports-psychologist can manufacture it.
If David Boon had been a poor player, like Dirk Wellham or Robbie Kerr for instance, no amount of World Cup-winning confidence could have enabled him to become the player he was 1987/88-1993/94. None.
Eh? Where did I deny it? I simply said that it's not as important as class. Boon was easily better than the likes of Wellham, and McDermott, Reid and Hughes were easily better than the likes of Gilbert, Davis and O'Donnell. Let's remind ourselves that O'Donnell himself was an incredibly important part in the 1987/88 victory, but did it turn him into a good Test bowler? No, because he was useless in that format, he didn't have the skill.who told you david boon was the boonie that we know from day one? he could have very easily been the next dirk welham! not just him even bruce reid and craig mcdermott would have gone the dave gilbert simon davis way quite easily.
right kind of success at the right time is a very important confidence booster without which you cant reach the next level from wherever you are. i am a filmmaker and i know this from experience.
craig mcdermott and david boon certainly gained in confidence from the world cup win in 1987. i was following their careers from 1984 and they were significantly different players, for the better, after lifting the reliance cup in 1987. no amount of head shaking from you can deny the importance of confidence and self-belief in the success of sportsmen.
TBH, I think it was probably Terry Alderman in 1989 that gave said advantage.Somewhat surprised nobody's mentioned this.
Helped to give Australia a psychological advantage over England that lasted, oh, about 12 years.
Yeah by just trying to keep him out plus, the last two Tests in 94/95 were in Adelaide and Perth - hardly spinning paradises, especially in those days. Plus, it's a lot easier when you're already either well behind or have lost the series. It's when the series is alive, that's when it counts and in 'live' Tests, they were pretty circumspect in their play of Warne to say the least.TBH, I think it was probably Terry Alderman in 1989 that gave said advantage.
It's easy to forget, but in 1993 and 1994/95 England improved their play against Warne markedly as the series' wore on.
Certainly the most important dismissal for Warney's bank account.Somewhat surprised nobody's mentioned this.
Helped to give Australia a psychological advantage over England that lasted, oh, about 12 years.
Yeah, but it's easily forgotten that England were on top of that game until Warne produced that delivery. Given Aus' own bowling difficulties in that series, it's not inconceivable that things could have turned out very diffrently. But perhaps not very likely given Aus' obvious superiority.TBH, I think it was probably Terry Alderman in 1989 that gave said advantage.
It's easy to forget, but in 1993 and 1994/95 England improved their play against Warne markedly as the series' wore on.