I never thought you'd take such a violent approach toward a twenty20 competitionI would ban everyone who had an association with the ICL from any BCCI sponsored tournaments. I would schedule international matches at the same time the ICL is playing thier matches to steal their audience. I would encourage other countries to ban players who took part in unofficial tournaments by promising more lucrative series against those countries if they did so and give them bad venues, times and shorter series if they went against our directive.
I would use my political connections to try and remove any tax exemption status from ICL events, and I would pressure advertisers into not supporting the ICL by excluding them from sponsoring any BCCI event in the future. I would encourage the rival network to fold the league by promising them something in the future (e.g, favored deals on TV rights, or choice of venues for certain ODIs, etc).
Some of those things being unethical and illegal, but in all honesty if I thought them a threat to my core business, that's what I'd want to do.
Well I wouldn't have gotten to the top of BCCI if I wasn't brutal .I never thought you'd take such a violent approach toward a twenty20 competition
so basically what the BCCI is trying to do currentlyI would ban everyone who had an association with the ICL from any BCCI sponsored tournaments. I would schedule international matches at the same time the ICL is playing thier matches to steal their audience. I would encourage other countries to ban players who took part in unofficial tournaments by promising more lucrative series against those countries if they did so and give them bad venues, times and shorter series if they went against our directive.
I would use my political connections to try and remove any tax exemption status from ICL events, and I would pressure advertisers into not supporting the ICL by excluding them from sponsoring any BCCI event in the future. I would encourage the rival network to fold the league by promising them something in the future (e.g, favored deals on TV rights, or choice of venues for certain ODIs, etc).
Some of those things being unethical and illegal, but in all honesty if I thought them a threat to my core business, that's what I'd want to do.
That remains to be seen.The ICL is on life support and it wont last more than 2 years .
Players joined the ICL because the money was very good even though they were warned and some may never play international cricket again.Now they a better option of IPL-the same great money and they get to play international cricket too-why would any cricketer who is any good join the ICL again-it is what it is.That remains to be seen.
If the IPL teams dont want those players then they maybe not good anyway.The ICL is already a 2nd tier competition-they wont do well with 2nd tier players.If they weren't offered terms to play in the IPL but were in the ICL.
No players who are drop dead fantastic, but TP Singh would be on the fringes of ODI selection if not for the ICL due to spectacular fielding, handy batting and useful spin bowling.Does the ICL have any good indian players? Like the domestic ones not counting the old players?
You'd be surprised what people will watch. The ICL's audiences for their first season were far from poor - infinitely better, UIMM, than the audiences for WSC (the only precendent)'s first season. We don't know what the future will hold, of course, but things certainly didn't start out-and-out badly.If the IPL teams dont want those players then they maybe not good anyway.The ICL is already a 2nd tier competition-they wont do well with 2nd tier players.
I watched the ICL occasionally on Zee Cinema, it wasn't too bad. Dean Jones, being a partial owner, was so enthusiastic about everything, it was mildly amusing. "Well, gee, that's the best straight drive I've ever seen". It was very corny as well, but in a good way, with theatrical demonstrations of commentators supporting their teams, I remember one commentator hammering a stump into a ground to emphasise which team he was supporting. The studio discussion was pretty solid too.You'd be surprised what people will watch. The ICL's audiences for their first season were far from poor - infinitely better, UIMM, than the audiences for WSC (the only precendent)'s first season. We don't know what the future will hold, of course, but things certainly didn't start out-and-out badly.
Haha no, pretty sure SS got excited at the prospect of a mass exodus of quality cricketers. Some left at the time but I'm sure the good ones are regretting the move now that the IPL is around and dominating. Only Jhunjhunwala, AN Ahmed and Ambati Rayudu are serious losses for Indian cricket.IIRR, the IPL wasn't even public knowledge at the time Bond signed with the ICL.
I seem to recall several Indian players signing with the ICL, incidentally - remember ss got extremely excited about it.