cricket betting betway blog banner small
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62

Thread: Shahid Afridi - The bowler

  1. #1
    International 12th Man deeps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    perth, australia
    Posts
    1,661

    Shahid Afridi - The bowler

    Most people know, that he was initially brought into the team back in 1997 as a spin bowler. This all got lost in the hype of his super fast 100 and his amazing, albeit erratic batting abilities.

    I think Afridi has gone back to concentrating on his bowling, and he has been a VERY VERY effective bowler for Pakistan over the past couple of years. In the twenty twenty world cup, Afridi was the leading wicket taker.

    Currently playing in the IPL, he has done extremely well, picking up crucial wickets whilst keeping his economy in the 6-8 RPO range, whcih is very good.

    I really rate him as a bowler, but it seems to go un noticed. I think his batting failures are over-shadowing his ability with the ball.

    He recently sneaked into the top 10 for ODI bowlers, yet gets no recognition on these boards or elsewhere as a world class spinner. Why is this the case?

  2. #2
    International Captain Days of Grace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Takasaki, Japan
    Posts
    5,584
    I think you answered your own question.
    Favorite XI: WG Grace, VT Trumper, IVA Richards, DCS Compton, FMM Worrell (c), GS Sobers, AC Gilchrist (wk), H Larwood, SK Warne, T Richardson, SE Bond

  3. #3
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by deeps View Post
    He recently sneaked into the top 10 for ODI bowlers, yet gets no recognition on these boards or elsewhere as a world class spinner. Why is this the case?
    Because he isn't one. I$C$C rankings mean little to most people on these boards, because they're nothing more than form-guides, and not neccessarily terribly reliable ones at that, because they go purely off absolute figures without taking account of how those figures were achieved.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  4. #4
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    39,838
    I don't know if he is a world class spinner, but he is certainly a very good limited overs bowler. I have been pretty impressed with his bowling lately, which I think has improved quite a bit, though probably it was always a little bit underrated.

    One of the major reasons people (like me!) don't rate him high is because most people care chiefly about Test matches and hold performances in that format as the benchmark. He has not accomplished a great deal in the Test arena yet, so most people don't really look at him seriously.

    To be honest, I fall into that category as well. I think he is a very good ODI/T20 bowler, but in the grand scheme of things, I don't much rate the format. It's a case of wake me up when he starts running through a lineup in a Test match type of situation.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
    Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
    "The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
    -My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

    How the Universe came from nothing


  5. #5
    International Captain Woodster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    6,442
    Yes a decent ODI bowler, but is not good enough to consistently trouble any Test sides. Good economy generally, bowls at a pace for a spinner that batsmen generally find difficult to line up and dominate with good variations. Seems to lack the true quality to succeed at Test cricket, lack of patience and genuine wicket taking threat.

  6. #6
    U19 Cricketer gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    439
    he could have succeeded in test matches too but was never given a consistent run
    a couple of failures in the english series and he was thrown out of the test arena.

    Its high time he was brought back into the test scene as the main all rounder

  7. #7
    International Debutant
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,684
    one of my favorite bowlers

    love his action, try to mimic it a lot actually lol

  8. #8
    Global Moderator vic_orthdox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    29,568
    One day cricket probably suits his bowling a bit more, because players need to come at him. At his pace, it can be very hard to do, and he is often very hard to hit straight. Think back to Symonds' innings vs Pakistan in the 2003 WC, and all his runs off Afridi came either through cover or backward point. In Tests, batsmen can sweat on him a bit more without the pressure to score.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Jupiter
    Posts
    1,355
    Quote Originally Posted by gunner View Post
    he could have succeeded in test matches too but was never given a consistent run
    a couple of failures in the english series and he was thrown out of the test arena.

    Its high time he was brought back into the test scene as the main all rounder
    Its Afridi who has never been serious in playing tests and at the start of every crucial series becomes "unfit" or "unavailable".Afridi,despite being a worst batsman & bowler,has what is described as " player's power" and its not possible to keep out of the test squad for longer period if he's willing to play & do well.TBH,he doesn't have the balls to be a good test batsman or bowler(by good I mean having batting averge of 40+ or bowling average of less than 30).

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    953
    meh

  11. #11
    International 12th Man deeps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    perth, australia
    Posts
    1,661
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    One day cricket probably suits his bowling a bit more, because players need to come at him. At his pace, it can be very hard to do, and he is often very hard to hit straight. Think back to Symonds' innings vs Pakistan in the 2003 WC, and all his runs off Afridi came either through cover or backward point. In Tests, batsmen can sweat on him a bit more without the pressure to score.
    Absolutely ridiciluos to say the least.

    Shahid Afridi:
    Batting
    Matches: 26
    Innings: 46
    NO: 1
    Runs: 1683
    HS: 156
    Ave: 37.40
    SR: 86.13
    100s: 5
    50's: 8

    Bowling
    Wickets: 47
    Ave: 34.89
    SR: 65.7
    Econ: 3.18



    Compared to the supposedly great all rounder Andrew Flintoff

    Batting
    Matches: 67
    Innings: 110
    NO: 6
    Runs: 3381
    HS: 167
    Ave: 32.5
    SR: 64.17
    100s: 5
    50's: 24

    Bowling
    Wickets: 197
    Ave: 32.02
    SR: 63.7
    Econ: 3.01



    Looking at these figures, it shows that Afridi is the better batsman. Flintoff is marginally the better bowler, but there isn't much between them in bowling.

    So why is one regarded so good, and the other regarded a poor test match player (or bowler for that matter)


    Afridi has played less than half the tests that Flintoff has, but they have the same number of 100's.


    I think Afridi is unfairly biased against, due to his style of play. People have pigeonholed him as an ODI specialist, and whilst they give him chances once in a while in Tests, he is quickly dropped after failing.

  12. #12
    International Regular shortpitched713's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,221
    Quote Originally Posted by deeps View Post
    I think Afridi is unfairly biased against, due to his style of play. People have pigeonholed him as an ODI specialist, and whilst they give him chances once in a while in Tests, he is quickly dropped after failing.
    AWTA, though the comparison with Flintoff is a bit rough as Flintoff has improved miles from his early performance, especially with his bowling.
    Proud 2nd member of GM-OLAS
    Honorary Assistant Vice-President and Inquisitor General of T2IBS (Twenty-20 is Boring Society)

    Fraz highlights the defining aspect of Shoaib's legacy:
    Quote Originally Posted by FRAZ View Post
    Those humanitarian works etc ?
    Quote Originally Posted by andruid View Post
    I feel Tendulkar's association with the money minting exploitation of cricket fandom by certain varying commercial interests tarnishes his greatness a tad.

  13. #13
    International 12th Man deeps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    perth, australia
    Posts
    1,661
    Quote Originally Posted by shortpitched713 View Post
    AWTA, though the comparison with Flintoff is a bit rough as Flintoff has improved miles from his early performance, especially with his bowling.
    You are right. Below stats are from over the past 4 years

    However Afridi's batting average improves too, whilst his bowling is slightly worse (average drop by about 3 rpw)



    Afridi:

    batting avg: 43
    bowling 37.35


    Flintoff:
    batting: 37.20
    bowling 27.17

  14. #14
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by deeps View Post
    Absolutely ridiciluos to say the least.

    Shahid Afridi:
    Batting
    Matches: 26
    Innings: 46
    NO: 1
    Runs: 1683
    HS: 156
    Ave: 37.40
    SR: 86.13
    100s: 5
    50's: 8

    Bowling
    Wickets: 47
    Ave: 34.89
    SR: 65.7
    Econ: 3.18



    Compared to the supposedly great all rounder Andrew Flintoff

    Batting
    Matches: 67
    Innings: 110
    NO: 6
    Runs: 3381
    HS: 167
    Ave: 32.5
    SR: 64.17
    100s: 5
    50's: 24

    Bowling
    Wickets: 197
    Ave: 32.02
    SR: 63.7
    Econ: 3.01



    Looking at these figures, it shows that Afridi is the better batsman. Flintoff is marginally the better bowler, but there isn't much between them in bowling.

    So why is one regarded so good, and the other regarded a poor test match player (or bowler for that matter)


    Afridi has played less than half the tests that Flintoff has, but they have the same number of 100's.


    I think Afridi is unfairly biased against, due to his style of play. People have pigeonholed him as an ODI specialist, and whilst they give him chances once in a while in Tests, he is quickly dropped after failing.
    Despite the fact Afridi has done worse in ODIs, by a long way, than he has in Tests, people have pidgeon-holed him as a ODI specialist.

    There's a good reason why Afridi has played so few Tests, it's because when he's bad he's an embarrassment and takes less time to get dropped than almost anyone would. So his good performances make more of an impact on his average.

    The notion that Afridi is even remotely close to being as good as Flintoff as a Test bowler is so utterly laughable that it beggars belief anyone would suggest it TBH. And poor batsman though Flintoff has often been, he's comfortably better than Afridi there too.

    Classic example of looking at figures without taking them in context.

  15. #15
    GGG
    GGG is offline
    State Captain GGG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Malta, New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,867
    Quote Originally Posted by bond21 View Post
    meh
    Yeah pretty much sums up what I think of him either with the bat or ball.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Shahid Afridi (ODI legend) ?
    By FRAZ in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 18-03-2015, 10:59 PM
  2. Shahid Afridi Vs MS Dhoni
    By gunner in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 16-08-2006, 02:32 AM
  3. Shahid Afridi...underated ?
    By sledger in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-02-2006, 03:19 PM
  4. shahid afridi question
    By deeps in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 21-03-2005, 06:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •