|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which country produces more raw talent? | |||
| Australia |
|
14 | 25.00% |
| England |
|
0 | 0% |
| West Indies |
|
2 | 3.57% |
| South Africa |
|
4 | 7.14% |
| New Zealand |
|
0 | 0% |
| India |
|
11 | 19.64% |
| Pakistan |
|
20 | 35.71% |
| Sri Lanka |
|
0 | 0% |
| Bangladesh |
|
2 | 3.57% |
| Zimbabwe |
|
0 | 0% |
| Irrelevent 11th option - OT only! |
|
3 | 5.36% |
| Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
World Traveller
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
Posts: 34,131
|
Which country produces more raw talent?
I'm going for India, but if the question was who develops it better then Australia >>>>>>>>>>>> everybody else. I don't know how many countries have a system better then the AIS System, if there is.. Sure the East Germans in the 80's, but a lot of their athletes were doped to the gills, and I don't know if Russia or China is a tad shady.
You obviously have Pakistan, but for some reason they can never pull their heads in for the greater good of their team, I'm not sure about Sri Lanka, but they have achieved a lot when you think how tiny the island is but with so many people, and Bangladesh, but it takes time to raise above their current levels. From what I've gathered there is some naturally talented cricketers there. I've always thought about the West Indies, but the lack of money, cohesion (at a board level) and infrusture with always hinder them in getting the best of their players. TBF I don't always follow WI cricket, but when I see some of their players in the team, it looks a name was drawn out of hat for no apparent reason and thrusted in the role, despite not being good enough or currently not good enough. I don't know enough about England, out of interest, how many people like cricket compared to those who like football, especially as kids who rather want to play for one of the biggest clubs in the EPL and earn more then the GPD of a improvished African nation in one season. And how many who do make it are either substandard or are just injury crocks? The Academy was really something that should of been brought in years before it did, it might have stopped us from being robbed of Darren Gough or Craig White's (don't laugh, I rated him quite a bit as a bowler) career? Far too many journeymen cricketers who cruise by on the easy life as well. South Africa do produce some really talented crickets, but then do have a lack of quality depth (If Amla does better then average 30 against Australia next summer, pick my avatar, and if it is Michael Jackson, your dead to me ), how many good openers or middle order batsmen or spin or fast bowlers who there who could replace any of the current lot and do well? Geniune question as well. Zimbabwe in my eyes are not a Test olaying nation, but I'll chuck 'em in the poll since officially they are. New Zealand have been done before, and frankally a post this long has burned me out
__________________
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever... RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
State Vice-Captain
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,402
|
Australia, obviously. But I'm voting for the second-best. In that case, Pakistan.
__________________
Australian Cricket Team Cricket World Cup Champions: 1987, 1999, 2003 and 2007 ICC Champions Trophy: 2006 Ashes Champions: 2006/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
State Vice-Captain
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney(currently)
Posts: 1,398
|
Pakistan definately, India seems to suffer from the revolving door selection poilicy as far as its players are concerned. Who besides the current India squad would you term as raw talent??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bitch please, I'm from West Yorkshire
Posts: 14,986
|
I reckon Australia finds their raw talent much earlier and is able to develop it better and earlier, which is why we get the idea that they have more raw talent, which is probably true in esscence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
State Vice-Captain
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,141
|
I think a good indicator of how much raw talent a country has is the ability to produce cricketers of all varieties. India doesn't seem to produce a lot of talent in the fast-bowling stakes, just like South Africa has a problem producing spinners. Overall, I would say Pakistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
State Captain
Join Date: May 2006
Location: california united states
Posts: 1,627
|
Pakistan.. alot of Aggrassive cricketers has come from pakistan over the years.. my second guess is india but the fact that less fast bowlers with quality comes from india gave my vote to pakistan..
__________________
The best test match ever http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mc1SR...eature=related Yahoo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct0lSesNpWs |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best up and coming talent | Tim | Cricket Chat | 57 | 22-04-2008 02:45 PM |
| Is talent more important than technique ?? | irfan | Coaching and Equipment Forum | 77 | 26-03-2007 04:06 PM |
| Real Talent (Competition) | Azed | Fantasy Cricket | 1 | 18-03-2007 01:46 PM |
| Which ground in your country produces the best cricket ? | Deja moo | Cricket Chat | 81 | 27-07-2005 10:13 AM |
| Talent Identification | age_master | Cricket Chat | 14 | 21-07-2003 08:22 PM |