Cricket Betting Site Betway
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 56 of 56
Like Tree25Likes

Thread: Best England team, ever?

  1. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Buttfuk Idaho
    Posts
    369
    Quote Originally Posted by a massive zebra
    No Warne being in the Team of the Century just shows the bias most people have towards modern players over those they have not seen. Had Warne played in the 50s and Laker in the 90s it would be the other way round.
    What absolute rubbish. That comment reaks of uphill gardening in every sense of the word.
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

  2. #47
    Banned Pinkline Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Vaucluse
    Posts
    157

    Uphill Gardening

    Totally agree Camel56 - Plod Squad
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

  3. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Buttfuk Idaho
    Posts
    369
    Finally some sense. Warne makes Laker look like an absolute plodder. Its taken Australia's leading social commentator to do it but its finally been cleared up.
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

  4. #49
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    62,992
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard
    It means that you ignore the fact that I'm wrong very rarely and concentrate on the tiny number of times that I'm not right.
    "Wrong very rarely" - OK, I'm trying to remember some of your not wrong comments, but am struggling.
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.


  5. #50
    Cricket Spectator
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Horsham
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Camel56
    Finally some sense. Warne makes Laker look like an absolute plodder. Its taken Australia's leading social commentator to do it but its finally been cleared up.
    Oh dear oh dear! It is a universally held wisdom that the great bowlers would be great bowlers no matter era they played in; the same goes for the batsmen, although I do wonder how well some of today's batters would have coped on a true sticky, which is why I would always have Sir Jack Hobbs as one of the openers. Laker was a great bowler, I don't give a fig what any of the rest of you might say. So OK, Richard has a point in that there was a change in the 70s (or maybe earlier) from leaving wickets uncovered to covering them at the slightest hint that the skies might just spit on them, but that does not invalidate the performances of the likes of Laker, Verity, Freeman, Lock (when he wasn't chucking), Fleetwood-Smith, O'Reilly, Benaud and countless others. As to the argument that Ashley Giles would have been as good as Laker if Ash had bowled in Laker's time, well I have to have serious doubts. I'm not anti-Giles (well, I was, but his performances this summer surprised many doubters), it's just that I don't think his style would have brought any more success then than it has up to now in this era.

    But, really, it really is invidious, unfair, to try and compare now and whatever 'then' you wish to take. Everything is and was so completely different, including, as some have said, the umpiring. Having said that I have been more than surprised at some of the decisions made in recent series. (Is the system of neutral umpires only succeeding in lowering standards? A topic for another discussion, I know.)

    Forza cricket

    Peter
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

  6. #51
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Sussexshark
    Oh dear oh dear! It is a universally held wisdom that the great bowlers would be great bowlers no matter era they played in; the same goes for the batsmen, although I do wonder how well some of today's batters would have coped on a true sticky, which is why I would always have Sir Jack Hobbs as one of the openers. Laker was a great bowler, I don't give a fig what any of the rest of you might say. So OK, Richard has a point in that there was a change in the 70s (or maybe earlier) from leaving wickets uncovered to covering them at the slightest hint that the skies might just spit on them, but that does not invalidate the performances of the likes of Laker, Verity, Freeman, Lock (when he wasn't chucking), Fleetwood-Smith, O'Reilly, Benaud and countless others.
    It certainly doesn't invalidate the performances of O'Reilly, Benaud and Grimmett (how you could discount him I don't know) but I'm afraid it just cannot be coincidence that no non-subcontinental fingerspinner has been an especially good bowler - never mind a great one - since the days of Underwood in the '60s.
    Freeman, Rhodes, Verity, Lock, Laker, etc. (don't really know why you put in Chuck Fleetwood-Smith - he of 10 Test-matches and an average of 37.38) were great bowlers in their era, but that era has gone now - fingerspinners can no longer be great bowlers (unless they are picked only on turning pitches - impossible, since you can't know for certain beforehand whether or not a pitch is going to turn appreciably). All the best spinners of the modern era (Qadir, Mushtaq Ahmed, Kumble, Murali, Warne) are wristspinners - as wristspin acquires a new dimension. All these are accurate to a degree previously left for dreams - and for Grimmett, O'Reilly and Benaud. Only in exceptional hands has wristspin ever been a true threat. Fingerspin, meanwhile, has had it's time - unless we do indeed go back to uncovered wickets, it'll never again be so.
    As to the argument that Ashley Giles would have been as good as Laker if Ash had bowled in Laker's time, well I have to have serious doubts. I'm not anti-Giles (well, I was, but his performances this summer surprised many doubters), it's just that I don't think his style would have brought any more success then than it has up to now in this era.
    His performances in the middle 3 Tests (that's all it was) didn't surprise me in the slightest - the pitches were turners, and he's almost always done well on turners. Had he played in an era where turners were far, far more common, I think it makes sense to guess that he'd have done rather better than he has in the days when they occur once in a blue moon - and in the subcontinent mostly.
    Fred Tetanus likes this.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  7. #52
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178
    "Wrong very rarely" - OK, I'm trying to remember some of your not wrong comments, but am struggling.
    When have I ever been shown quite clearly to be wrong - and refused to admit it - about a player whom I said I did not believe capable of taking cheap wickets with good deliveries, or a batsman capable of scoring chanceless runs?
    Not very often, is it?
    Just because you and a few others won't accept my methods of judging, I have to be wrong all the time in your estimation.
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

  8. #53
    Hall of Fame Member Jamee999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Leicestershire, UK
    Posts
    15,094
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178
    "Wrong very rarely" - OK, I'm trying to remember some of your not wrong comments, but am struggling.
    Once again he's(Richard) wrong
    Or something.

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990 - 15/4/2006

  9. #54
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    "He's(Richard) wrong".
    Excellent grammar there, young man.
    Last edited by Richard; 29-11-2004 at 09:35 AM.
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

  10. #55
    International Vice-Captain a massive zebra's Avatar
    Eggs Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on my ass @ the PC
    Posts
    4,192
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard
    Excellent grammer there, young man.
    Excellent spelling there, old chap.
    THE ULTIMATE CRICKET WEB ARCADE EGGS CHAMPION

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1990-2006
    RIP Craig Walsh (AKA "Craig"), 1985-2012

  11. #56
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Slip of the keyboard, very thought of the dream chord.
    And, as you can now see, just malicious misquoting.
    Fred Tetanus likes this.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •