Yeah but also wouldn't say Hayden is four times better than him (if you can interpret it that way) at the time of posting. Granted Hayden's peak has been one of the greatest in ODI history, it seems it is speaking for the whole 7 year period with such a gap.I've always said Clarke is, but at the same time I don't think you could call him top 5 from 2000 onwards yet.
I don't think you can interpret it that way. If you had asked to pick the best batsman in Aussie history, Bradman would win by 100-0, which doesn't mean he is 100x better than the next guy.Yeah but also wouldn't say Hayden is four times better than him (if you can interpret it that way) at the time of posting. Granted Hayden's peak has been one of the greatest in ODI history, it seems it is speaking for the whole 7 year period with such a gap.
Wheres Lehmann/Bevan/Hussey ?
Hardly surprising, as everyone has five votes everyone (who isn't stupid) is going to vote for those two.Neck and neck between Tendulkar and Ponting.
Breaking News: 28-30% of voters stupid!Hardly surprising, as everyone has five votes everyone (who isn't stupid) is going to vote for those two.
Haha, GTFO.1. Hayden
2. Gilchrist
3. Symonds
4. Ponting
5. Clarke
Hayden, Gilchrist and Symonds are unstoppable once they get going. Absolute run machines they are.
Ponting and Clarke because theyre awesome and great to watch.
Find them yourselves.There's no strike rates in the first post Can't vote without knowing strike rates.
Averages since 2000 takes long enough yet surely you have a fair idea of S/R, like your Gilchrists are faster than your Atapattu's, your Kallises lower than your Haydens.ha ha, thought you'd say that. Yeah I cant be f**ked, and I'm sure you can't either.