He's injured.Watto?
Fair call.Regardless.
Paine wouldn't be in the top ten tbh.Paine would also be infront of Hodge as Test opener as well.
Well, I haven't got in the runs for Australia yet, when do I get a chance to do so?If it were a case of picking those most likely to win the next game it'd clearly be Haddin, but it seems (sensibly IMO) that Australia aren't taking that mindset, and are more trying to allow everyone to score, thereby saying "Haddin's already got in the runs, let's give Hodge some more chance to do so".
And given that scoring runs here is - wrongly, but undeniably nonetheless - probably going to impact upon Hodge's chances of a Test spot, I hope he scores some soon.
Yeah I know but considering that you would think Australia would be looking for a long term opening option and Rogers and Jaques both got injuried then I can see Paine getting a run. But most likely they would go to Hussey first. Still reckon Paine would get a run as Test opener infront of Hodge or Katich.Nah I don't think so, Paine's largely unproven, and fell away pretty badly after his roaring early season form.
You don't possess the talent of Brad Hodge.Well, I haven't got in the runs for Australia yet, when do I get a chance to do so?