I asked James to do something about it in the problems section...Anna said:Caddick hasn't been sensored!! A lack in the staff's concentration perhaps? Or maybe they got bored with it...
Yeah I saw that on the highlights. Thought it was Vaughan under the helmet though...but Dawson it is!Anna said:Here it is! It had me tittering for ages
Hehehehe, that is silly. But he just hit 85 so he's backAnna said:Just found another pretty daft picture. I got it ages ago, but it's still funny
Knight isn't playing as he's failed nearly every time he's played. Hick failed nearly all the time too. England just decided that it was time they were dropped, I mean Raprakash came up with that superb ton against Australia but did nothing again and was appauling in NZ. If they haven't succeded regularly by 20 Tests then drop them, hopefully the mistake won't take that long thoughLangeveldt said:why isnt Knight or Hick playing test matches? Dont tell me Key is better.........
Nah neither can I, he could be a solid player though.Langeveldt said:I think its safe to say that Hick is a huge enigma, but at least he was brilliant occasionaly. I dont see Key ever showing brilliance.
Maybe he will prove me wrong though.
He only is perceived to have failed because of his career in FC Cricket - looking at his stats compared with the likes of Crawley and Butcher of the current side, and I know who I'd rather have seen in an England shirt.Rik said:Hick failed nearly all the time too.
Which ever way you look at it, averaging 31 in Tests is not good, and that average was still dropping. Butchers, however, seems to keep rising along with Crawley's.marc71178 said:He only is perceived to have failed because of his career in FC Cricket - looking at his stats compared with the likes of Crawley and Butcher of the current side, and I know who I'd rather have seen in an England shirt.
Yeah he was dire after his 100 against Zimbabwe in 2000 - only one 50 in 10 tests. He should have been in the ODI side all along though, seeing as he has nearly 4000 runs at 37 and a SR of 74. It's even worse when you consider the fact that we've been crying out for a number 3 since. Here is Hick's record at 3:Rik said:Which ever way you look at it, averaging 31 in Tests is not good, and that average was still dropping. Butchers, however, seems to keep rising along with Crawley's.
If Warnie's in the slips, it'll be turned into an Esky!Gotchya said:Aussie selectors finally find Mark Waughs substitute