Cameron-Moss
U19 12th Man
The title pretty much says it all. APOT can it be in MPH
Clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW_Bhhh11DIwikipedia said:Akhtar's delivery at 161.4km/h (100.2mph) stands as the fastest recorded to date.
Even if a bouncer goes over the boundary without another bounce?You can't bowl six byes without overthrows being involved.
:O I'd heard of him half-volleying the sightscreen at Perth but never knew he'd actually got it over the rope on the full.:O, BTW I've got a book on cricket records, and a batting team got 6 byes, its the only on record, he bowled a bouncer that fast, it went over the boundray without the batsmen touching it, I'll type the book up later, and post it in a new thread.
In the (near enough impossible) event of that, it'd be four byes (or five wides more likely).Even if a bouncer goes over the boundary without another bounce?
Obviously, you have never played Cricket 07In the (near enough impossible) event of that...
Haha, was about to say that myself.Obviously, you have never played Cricket 07
I meant to say it didn't bounce, I'm only 10...You can't bowl six byes without overthrows being involved.
with short boundaries down the ground!Would have to be a beamer.....
Ian Chappell mentions it quite a bit.:O I'd heard of him half-volleying the sightscreen at Perth but never knew he'd actually got it over the rope on the full.
Then it would have been five no-balls or five wides; you can only get six for clearing the boundary if the ball has been hit. Common misconception to be honest, always good to clear it up... not as common as the Mankading law misconceptions however...Would have to be a beamer.....
actually, I am not very clear abt that one too...Then it would have been five no-balls or five wides; you can only get six for clearing the boundary if the ball has been hit. Common misconception to be honest, always good to clear it up... not as common as the Mankading law misconceptions however...
Current state of the Mankading law is: once the bowler has entered his delivery stride, the non-striker can do whatever he likes - so, if the non-striker is quick between the wickets, he can be a good three strides down the wicket before the bowler has made front-foot contact and let go of the ball. If he then stops and takes the bails off it's dead ball: no warnings, no nothing.actually, I am not very clear abt that one too...
It would be nice if u can post some clarifications regarding the Mankadding law... What was allowed and what wasn't etc.... And I reckon now it has simply been taken out, right?
Thanks, Neil.Current state of the Mankading law is: once the bowler has entered his delivery stride, the non-striker can do whatever he likes - so, if the non-striker is quick between the wickets, he can be a good three strides down the wicket before the bowler has made front-foot contact and let go of the ball. If he then stops and takes the bails off it's dead ball: no warnings, no nothing.
Basically what it means is that there should be absolutely no way anyone should ever be Mankaded unless they are truly brain-dead and just standing outside of their crease as the bowler runs up.
Law Reference 42.15
The bowler is permitted, before entering his delivery stride, to attempt to run out the non-striker. The ball shall not count in the over.
The umpire shall call and signal Dead ball as soon as possible if the bowler fails in the attempt to run out the non-striker.
Law Reference Appendix D
Delivery stride is the stride during which the delivery swing is made, whether the ball is released or not.
It starts when the bowler's back foot lands for that stride and ends when the front foot lands in the same stride.