Yeah, it is, and they did.Watching cricket uninterrupted is a good idea to me. Something Ch4 stuggled to do.
Sky don't have Mark Nicholas anymore, good enough for me.I... seriously... am... struggling... to... comprehend... the... fact... that... someone... is... trying... to... suggest... that... a... Sky... only... package... is... a... good... idea...
Terrible, terrible idea. If he was advocating going back to 60 overs, great... but I have grown to hate 40-over stuff pretty well, too. 50 overs is only just long enough to have a proper game of cricket - 40 certainly isn't.Can't say I'm impressed by Soper, especially with this daft idea:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/6915218.stm
Good luck Mike - I can really see the rest of the world going for 40 over cricket (it should have never have been revived here anyway). IMO he'll have a lot of trouble getting this idea off the ground...(thank God!!)
Those who had sky could watch cricket uninterrupted as coverage would continue on film 4 when the horse racing & what not was on.Watching cricket uninterrupted is a good idea to me. Something Ch4 stuggled to do.