I don't think so, but i believe there are plans to televise the OD series. Nimbus have the rights as far as I know.Is this match being televised anywhere?
A better effort than 97 in the first innings.Kenya is a better one day side than 4 day side,gee kenya didn't even make the interoninental final this year,so what you expect.
There is live commentary on cricinfoIs this match being televised anywhere?
I know, I was just wondering how fast the bowlers are bowling, if they are bowling well or the Kenyans are batting bad, things like that.There is live commentary on cricinfo
I think you will find Kenya also much more competitive in the One Day games. The way many batsmen played yesterday showed they were not used to batting simply to occupy the crease - they were still trying to score at over a run a ball, despite the likelihood of an innings defeat.One more mismatch- India 408 for eight declared. Kenya at 191 for eight. The Indian reserves don't know what will hit them when their Lankan counterparts return. Chawla, though, continues to take wickets.
There's a lot they can do--What do you propose the BCCI should do to help Pathan?
-Is Pankaj Singh quick? There was a picture of him sending someones off stump cartwheeling against Kenya.
-Why is everyone so skeptical of their chances against Sri Lanka A, India A could not have done more impressively against Kenya and Zimbabwe.
So you keep someone in the team, despite the fact that they are playing like absolute rubbish? It makes no sense at all to me really - if he's not performing up to standard, he shouldn't be selected. Even aside from that, how on earth would continually being smashed around the ground actually help him? It'd just destroy his confidence further really. The best option was exactly what they have done IMO - dropping him back to domestic cricket and given him ample opportunity to improve his cricket by selecting him in A teams at the like. That's what is happening. If he's good enough, he'll be back. If he's not, he won't.Arjun said:Keep Irfan in the team regularly, just as they've persisted with Agarkar. The replacements are not much good either, and the team isn't as good without him.
Sending him to places like Zimbabwe and Kenya does not help one bit. Zaheer, in comparision, played in the English county season, and even Tier II teams are better competition than what he's facing now.So you keep someone in the team, despite the fact that they are playing like absolute rubbish? It makes no sense at all to me really - if he's not performing up to standard, he shouldn't be selected. Even aside from that, how on earth would continually being smashed around the ground actually help him? It'd just destroy his confidence further really. The best option was exactly what they have done IMO - dropping him back to domestic cricket and given him ample opportunity to improve his cricket by selecting him in A teams at the like. That's what is happening. If he's good enough, he'll be back. If he's not, he won't.
Neither does not sending him, though. I hardly see why it was a bad move.Sending him to places like Zimbabwe and Kenya does not help one bit
That isn't something that arranged by the BCCI though - a county would have to offer Pathan a contract and he'd have to take it. I don't see how it's relevant.Zaheer, in comparision, played in the English county season, and even Tier II teams are better competition than what he's facing now.
And Irfan Pathan has still managed to be horrendously worse than the lot of them. His bowling prior to his dropping was disgraceful - he was lucky not to be dropped even earlier.It's not like Irfan's the only seamer bowling rubbish. Sreesanth's been off-colour, RP Singh has been a mere support act, Agarkar's been slightly-better-than-average, only to let the team down at key moments.
.. which is why he wasn't dropped even earlier. He was selected as an allrounder eventually, but his bowling was that bad at the time that it wasn't even good enough for that role. Furthermore, he could have ended up stuck in that role, never aspiring to improve him bowling back to the standard it was previously - his dropping sent him the message that he simply wasn't bowling well enough to make the team, which was an entirely true fact.Moreover, his batting offers a big advantage over the rest.
And he was dropped for a reason as well.He was picked ahead of seam-bowling all-rounders like Bangar and JP Yadav for a reason back then
Firstly, there's a difference between form and decline. You don't find yourself in bad form for years at a time - something has obviously gone wrong with his bowling - something that cannot simply be put down the confines of form. He needed to go back to domestic cricket and fix that up - so he's done that.There's a difference between dropping him until he returns to form, and casting him aside without much of a concern.